Jeff bezos never existed
(twitter.com)
Comments (15)
sorted by:
a) All implies nature; tech/tekhnē implies artifice shaped within all of nature.
b) To own implies taking into possession...few suggest technology to tempt many to take artifice into possession, while ignoring that nature moves and cannot be taken into possession.
Data/do - "to give"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/data
Isn't it hilarious that many believe that few own data, while ignoring that data implies given to many? The aim of spell-craft is about inverting the thought process of others.
As for the origin of data...only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) being (life). There's nothing to give or take from one another, which nature not already offers for FREE will of choice.
Free will of choice? Does that mean thinking?
a) Mean/men - "to think"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mean
Asking for the meaning of anything implies thinking...no matter the answer.
b) Think/tong - "to think; feel"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/think + Feel/pel - "to thrust"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/feel
Thrust implies being (life) thrust (inception towards death) aka the motion tempting ones e-motion to respond to, which implies...
c) Free will of choice aka free emotions within the dominance of motion aka will/want within need aka of motion into emotion aka choice within balance.
d) Ones free will of choice needs to respond to what all motion makes perceivable to each ones perception...others utilize suggestion to tempt ones emotion to want to ignore that.
e) Thinking straight implies ones perception adapting by free will of choice to all perceivable moving through as inspiration, while holding onto suggested information tempts one to think circular (logic).
This circular thinking is why you asked for the meaning of something, hence submitting your free will of choice to whatever my free will of choice answers or not.
In short: Nature doesn't give meaning...it thrusts all through each ones free will of choice for adaptation. One wants to think; one needs to adapt...
Ask yourself...how often have I mentally thought about something instead of physically doing it? Meanwhile...your heart doesn't think; it adapts to whatever goes through it.
Next...what if the words I think in represent the information suggested by others to tempt me to ignore adaptation to perceivable inspiration?
Thinking about what others are suggesting binds ones "free" will of choice to the suggested...
Ok so free will of choice isn't thinking or willing but feeling?
Consenting to a suggestion...wills consent; thinks about suggested, and feels the emotion of conflict (is vs isn't).
Consent binds what was FREE. WILL/want distracts from need. From suggested inverts OF perceivable. Conflict imbalances CHOICE.
Feeling implies emotion/emotio - "to move from". Being implies within (life) motion (inception towards death). Emotion implies moving from one another, while ignoring to adapt to being moved.
Motion generates matter by internal separation from one another...emotions tempt matter to and fro one another, hence turning against one another, while ignoring that nature sets beings apart from one another.
Resisting the conflict of to vs fro aka debate over an issue aka reasoning about suggested aka vacillation implies being free will of choice at the center of balance, while being tempted with imbalance from the circumference.
The sentence you wrote starts with OK, which implies a to vs fro conflict between OK vs NOT OK within your mind aka circular logic. Same with IS vs ISN'T. You are being tricked to position your free will of choice into an imbalance, while ignoring balance.
IS vs ISN'T represents an artifice tempting you to ignore that nature WAS before you came into being. Only if you...by free will of choice...choose to let go of IS or ISN'T will you perceive WAS. Otherwise circular logic prevents you from thinking straight.
Zuck, bessos, musk are just the faces they put on
Wedding photos are typically heavily edited and photoshopped. The chair leg could have had something ugly in front of it and the editor was sloppy. The buttons... well you need to show a full image of the back of the dress. The safety pin probably is there because it tore from being so tight. Sorry this is a bit of a stretch .
Good!!! Thank you!!If enough people dont believe in the matrix it falls apart and im just not ready!!
https://x.com/FELibrary_/status/1944933449950732478
Please keep becoming more insane, discrediting everything you post.
Listen to it again dicknose
No.
Ok u/tallesthooknose
Earth still isn’t flat.
u/topshill