Try prompting it anything about the Holohoax and see if that's how it works. Don't you think they deliberately program how it responds to this stuff? It rolls by the IDF rulebook throwing labels like "Holocaust revisionist/deniers". I certainly didn't lead it that way.
There is no such a thing like truth generating machine. It's obviously an LLM algorithm trained on datasets. By "admit" I meant it had to acknowledge the contradiction between the official figures. It's figurative speech, dude.
You're, like others here, miss the forest for the tree. ChatGPT is not important here, it's just a way to showcase the contradiction in the figures given by the Holocaust narrative. It functions a bit like an NPC in a platonic dialogue of you will.
GPT is not a truth generating machine. It does not "admit" anything.
You provided enough context that the next most likely random words were the ones you wanted.
Try prompting it anything about the Holohoax and see if that's how it works. Don't you think they deliberately program how it responds to this stuff? It rolls by the IDF rulebook throwing labels like "Holocaust revisionist/deniers". I certainly didn't lead it that way.
There is no such a thing like truth generating machine. It's obviously an LLM algorithm trained on datasets. By "admit" I meant it had to acknowledge the contradiction between the official figures. It's figurative speech, dude.
I have done a lot of chatbot work , you can box the context in. And yes, that is how it works.
You're, like others here, miss the forest for the tree. ChatGPT is not important here, it's just a way to showcase the contradiction in the figures given by the Holocaust narrative. It functions a bit like an NPC in a platonic dialogue of you will.
you used the word "admit" as though the random word generating computer you're using has agency
and, just for cultural context, jews call any descendant of a jew who lived in Europe in 1945 a "holocaust survivor"
so the wood and the trees are stage props