Try prompting it anything about the Holohoax and see if that's how it works. Don't you think they deliberately program how it responds to this stuff? It rolls by the IDF rulebook throwing labels like "Holocaust revisionist/deniers". I certainly didn't lead it that way.
There is no such a thing like truth generating machine. It's obviously an LLM algorithm trained on datasets. By "admit" I meant it had to acknowledge the contradiction between the official figures. It's figurative speech, dude.
You're, like others here, miss the forest for the tree. ChatGPT is not important here, it's just a way to showcase the contradiction in the figures given by the Holocaust narrative. It functions a bit like an NPC in a platonic dialogue of you will.
Dude, either read what the post is about or pass. It's about Claims Conference specifically - it doesn't matter what other organizations count as "holocaust survivors". If you had red the chat, you'd see that ChatGPT made a similar argument which I refuted:
The definition is pretty strict actually. For compensation purposes, the Claims Conference defines survivors as Jews who lived in Nazi-occupied countries, ghettos, camps, or hiding for at least a specified period (e.g., 18 months in hiding or 6 months in a camp/ghetto). This excludes some refugees who fled early.
Demographic Estimates: The ~200,000–220,000 survivors alive in 2025 (per the Claims Conference) are based on registered claimants and projections, but unregistered survivors (e.g., those who never sought compensation) may increase the total slightly.
So the 200k figure comes out of the Claims Conference and it only include jews who lived in Nazi-occupied countries. Nice try though.
What's the point in such irrelevant comments? You obviously know everything there is about AI and cooked holocaust figures, so don't waste your time.
Try prompting it anything about the Holohoax and see if that's how it works. Don't you think they deliberately program how it responds to this stuff? It rolls by the IDF rulebook throwing labels like "Holocaust revisionist/deniers". I certainly didn't lead it that way.
There is no such a thing like truth generating machine. It's obviously an LLM algorithm trained on datasets. By "admit" I meant it had to acknowledge the contradiction between the official figures. It's figurative speech, dude.
I have done a lot of chatbot work , you can box the context in. And yes, that is how it works.
You're, like others here, miss the forest for the tree. ChatGPT is not important here, it's just a way to showcase the contradiction in the figures given by the Holocaust narrative. It functions a bit like an NPC in a platonic dialogue of you will.
you used the word "admit" as though the random word generating computer you're using has agency
and, just for cultural context, jews call any descendant of a jew who lived in Europe in 1945 a "holocaust survivor"
so the wood and the trees are stage props
Dude, either read what the post is about or pass. It's about Claims Conference specifically - it doesn't matter what other organizations count as "holocaust survivors". If you had red the chat, you'd see that ChatGPT made a similar argument which I refuted:
What's the point in such irrelevant comments? You obviously know everything there is about AI and cooked holocaust figures, so don't waste your time.