It's just motional force. Nothing crazy. Acceleration and centrific forces are overpowering boyancy and electrostatics forces. It's just math.
Gravity is totally waste of brain power. It's not needed for any calculation in physics. Gravity is just acceleration, that's all. It's not a force, it's not a constant even. It's just an agreed upon average acceleration.
All of astrophysics is pseudoscience based on horribly weak fundamentals of this earth and sun.
Here comes the bots and globe saviors to tell me FE is a psy op and it's not worth learning. They're right, FE is a psy op, that hides the truth that earth is not a globe. And it's flat and stationary.
But first you have to think for yourself, and figure out why gravity is such a hoax.
I find it hilarious that every Foucault's pendulum needs a person to start it. And then it keeps going, and somehow this proves the earth is a ball.
How, exactly explain, does this mean the earth is moving? It's just a huge jump to conclusion without any logic.
All the cranes in the world, none of them automatically become a pendulum when they are turned off. Just hanging still.
Foucault's pendulum is a phenomenon, but I don't need to connect that phenomenon to the debate. The earth doesn't curve, by all observations and measurements. So, this pendulum moving constantly doesn't address the missing curve, or many other inconsistencies in the globe and space theories.
It's ok that I cannot explain how the pendulum works, we can all have theories about why it works, and none of those theories need to be "because the earth is moving"
Again, if it was because of the earth, then why does someone need to start the pendulum? Why doesn't it just start by itself?
It could be the material, maybe if the pendulum was a heavy plastic ball, then this wouldn't work, this, we might conclude that this has something to do with electro statics, which is a relatively strong force that we can measure.
So, I think it's fair to say that I have debunked Foucault's pendulum as a method to prove the earth is moving, just now.
But let's hear your thoughts. How does this pendulum prove the earth is in motion?
If we are rotating at a constant velocity and also have orbital velocity, then why could we not measure any acceleration and deceleration? Do a velocity diagram of earth rotating and moving forward at the same time. The surface of the earth would experience increased velocity while rotating with orbit and decreased velocity while rotating against orbit.
Without forcing your beliefs that we are on a globe in space, how do you explain this?
Newton proposed his theories in 1687. Once enough scientifically tested evidence showed no contradictions, they were declared Newton's three laws of universal gravity and motion. Challenged only by the theory of relativity by Einstein, but ultimately determined that relativity actually accounts for gravitational effects.
But yeah, go ahead and think that you are right because you post on an internet forum...
Look at the horizon, looks a bit like microsoft flight simulator with not much detail or anything but just fog, i mean it coulda been a foggy day.
What really tips it off for me, is who the fuck would attach a cup holder to the dashboard of a small plane made out of thin metal, thats asking to get scalped or stabbed in the face.
Its possible its just a really good simulator, could even be a commercial setup to train pilots. Reminds me a bit of this diy tank project.
interesting
syphon & momentum
It's just motional force. Nothing crazy. Acceleration and centrific forces are overpowering boyancy and electrostatics forces. It's just math.
Gravity is totally waste of brain power. It's not needed for any calculation in physics. Gravity is just acceleration, that's all. It's not a force, it's not a constant even. It's just an agreed upon average acceleration.
All of astrophysics is pseudoscience based on horribly weak fundamentals of this earth and sun.
Here comes the bots and globe saviors to tell me FE is a psy op and it's not worth learning. They're right, FE is a psy op, that hides the truth that earth is not a globe. And it's flat and stationary.
But first you have to think for yourself, and figure out why gravity is such a hoax.
Then it isn’t acceleration.
Literally is.
Foucault's pendulum, care to explain?
I find it hilarious that every Foucault's pendulum needs a person to start it. And then it keeps going, and somehow this proves the earth is a ball.
How, exactly explain, does this mean the earth is moving? It's just a huge jump to conclusion without any logic.
All the cranes in the world, none of them automatically become a pendulum when they are turned off. Just hanging still.
Foucault's pendulum is a phenomenon, but I don't need to connect that phenomenon to the debate. The earth doesn't curve, by all observations and measurements. So, this pendulum moving constantly doesn't address the missing curve, or many other inconsistencies in the globe and space theories.
It's ok that I cannot explain how the pendulum works, we can all have theories about why it works, and none of those theories need to be "because the earth is moving"
Again, if it was because of the earth, then why does someone need to start the pendulum? Why doesn't it just start by itself?
It could be the material, maybe if the pendulum was a heavy plastic ball, then this wouldn't work, this, we might conclude that this has something to do with electro statics, which is a relatively strong force that we can measure.
So, I think it's fair to say that I have debunked Foucault's pendulum as a method to prove the earth is moving, just now.
But let's hear your thoughts. How does this pendulum prove the earth is in motion?
If we are rotating at a constant velocity and also have orbital velocity, then why could we not measure any acceleration and deceleration? Do a velocity diagram of earth rotating and moving forward at the same time. The surface of the earth would experience increased velocity while rotating with orbit and decreased velocity while rotating against orbit.
Without forcing your beliefs that we are on a globe in space, how do you explain this?
Why do you stay in your seat in a roller coaster? Physics is hard, but all of this is perfectly explainable, as are the Laws of Gravity...
So now we went from theory of gravity to laws of gravity?? What year did that happen?
Newton proposed his theories in 1687. Once enough scientifically tested evidence showed no contradictions, they were declared Newton's three laws of universal gravity and motion. Challenged only by the theory of relativity by Einstein, but ultimately determined that relativity actually accounts for gravitational effects.
But yeah, go ahead and think that you are right because you post on an internet forum...
Lmao, I dont think its real.
Look at the horizon, looks a bit like microsoft flight simulator with not much detail or anything but just fog, i mean it coulda been a foggy day.
What really tips it off for me, is who the fuck would attach a cup holder to the dashboard of a small plane made out of thin metal, thats asking to get scalped or stabbed in the face.
Its possible its just a really good simulator, could even be a commercial setup to train pilots. Reminds me a bit of this diy tank project.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_HMfc1ec_Y
-edit- The video looks legit, although the newest flight simulator looks pretty good with raytracing.
https://youtu.be/zOY4gVWgm50?t=306
Could be ai as well, but another thing that tipped me off is the bubbles. They never change direction at any point.
If all it took was doing barrel rolls to break gravity, I think it would have been discovered long ago but who knows.
Kill yourself, admitted paid jewish shill.
Try this experiment. Go find a pull up bar, hang upside with a cup of water and a water bottle, and try to pour upward like in the video.
Take a video and show us the results.
Dude, we know.
Welcome to fifteen minutes ago.
That's why this is so bizarre.
You're assuming this video is real. I'd much rather trust a real life experiment than some likely faked video.
I'm assuming no such thing, thanks for understanding.
To wit : when you think about it, it's equally bizarre whether or not it's real.
So....