I certainly think its possible, my first thought would be maybe you have some setting that deletes files when they are old enough, or maybe you accidentally cleared something one day.

I just say that because I thought my phone was tapped lmao, but I was just being retarded. Although it certainly did display signs of being hacked, (phone being warm all the time, unexplained data usage, randomly lighting up in the middle of the night), but I found a ip, googled it, thought it belonged to the british defence network, but turns out mobile networks reuse british defence ips on their internal networks. So if it is hacked I certainly have no proof.

But I do remember reading 20 years ago that isreal had this techonlogy to delete photos/videos/pdfs off all computers connected to the internet. Sure it does sound like bullshit but I wouldnt be surprised if the mandela effect is tied into this.

What makes more sense to you? Collapsing timelines, or a internet worm capable of rewriting/controlling information in near real time?

https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1kszu0b/maybe_mandela_wore_a_pair/

Like there are alot of mandella effects which could be me misremembering, but im fucking 100% certain that there was a cornucopia there.

Prolly the assholes testing out their tool.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cornucopia-fruit-of-the-loom/

Fuck off snopes.

The legal argument presented in emails to Snopes, and also proffered on Reddit, is that, according to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Fruit of the Loom itself described its trademark as containing a cornucopia.

This misconception stems from the fact that at least one trademark registration document apparently filed by Fruit of the Loom used what is known as design search code 05.09.14 to describe the trademark — indicating an image with "Baskets of fruit; Containers of fruit; [or] Cornucopia (horn of plenty)." Reddit posts posit that this document has some legal bearing in the world of intellectual property law.

First, this is not the case. The primary goal of these search codes, according to the USPTO, is to identify the most "significant" visual design elements as an aid for prospective applications to search for similar trademarks. While Snopes has no insight into the legal decisions made by Fruit of the Loom in the 1970s, the 05.09.14 example of a cornucopia contained in the USPTO database classification manual does share some visual similarity with the Fruit of the Loom logo at issue:

Actual insanity that normys fall for the mental gymnastics.

Second, and more to the point, this document is irrelevant. Filed in 1973, the corporate contact was listed as an office in Manhattan. The application itself was rejected by the USPTO. Whatever this document is, it does not represent the active Fruit of the Loom trademark application. The USPTO challenged the cornucopia-containing application in 1980, apparently rejecting it on clerical grounds. The application was officially canceled in 1988.

LMAO, must be why the tool missed that piece.