Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

4
Poor, poor aether. Its only sin? Existing...... (media.scored.co)
posted 217 days ago by Dps1879 217 days ago by Dps1879 +8 / -4
25 comments share
25 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– CrazyRussian 4 points 216 days ago +4 / -0

Some older versions of the periodic table

I posted older versions of the periodic table. One is directly from Mendeleev handwritten drafts. There was no any periodic table older. There is no any aether in it.

one published by Mendeleev in 1904

Mendeleev published an article in 1905, with a modified table where he marked a place for two hypotetical elements "x" and "y" he discussed in article and tried to estimate their properties. He never assumed this table as a "correct" one or intended for teaching or whatever.

(Notice that nobody from those obsessed with aether posts ever discuss that second element - coronium. How is that? It is as important as aether element named "newtonium" by Mendeleev, and if coronium does not exist, then there is no place for newtonium)

This modified periodic table from 1905 article is nothing more than an illustration for the article. Mendeleev himself wrote about this:

Я и смотрю на свою далекую от полноты попытку понять природу мирового эфира с реально химической стороны не более, как на выражение суммы накопившихся у меня впечатлений, вырывающихся исключительно лишь по той причине, что мне не хочется, чтобы мысли, навеваемые действительностью, пропадали. Вероятно, что подобные же мысли приходили многим, но, пока они не изложены, они легко и часто исчезают и не развиваются, не влекут за собой постепенного накопления достоверного, которое одно сохраняется. Если в них есть хоть часть природной правды, которую мы все ищем, попытка моя не напрасна, ее разработают, дополнят и поправят, а если моя мысль неверна в основаниях, ее изложение, после того или иного вида опровержения, предохранит других от повторения. Другого пути для медленного, но прочного движения вперед я не знаю

my simplified English translation:

I look at my attempt to understand the nature of aether from real chemical side, which is far from completeness, as expression of the sum of my accumulated impressions, flowing out only because I don't want my thoughts about it to be lost. Probably thoughts like mine come to many minds, but until they expounded, they easily come lost, does not develop and so does not accumulate as knowledge which is only matter. If they have a tiny bit of natural truth we all look for, my attempt is not vain, it will be developed and enchanced by others. If my thought is inherently wrong, after one or another kind of disproval, it's expound will prevent others to make my mistake. I don't know any other way for slow, but strong movement forward.

Mendeleev know about aether theory since the beginning, but never really included it in his periodic table, because it is a table of physical and chemical properties. He directly wrote that there are much more research on aether have to be done, but nobody tried to isolate it in pure form and study its physical and chemical properties. So, it was never put in periodic table.

Do the research, find out physical and chemical properties of aether, and only then it will get a right to have place in periodic table. This had not been done earlier and nobody of those who talk about aether theory today have any intention to do that. Case closed. There is no place for aether in periodic table, just like 150 years ago.

His 1905 article was like "OK, guys, if you wnat to imagine where aether could be placed in periodic table, then here is my assumptions, and it could look like that.". Account it as a prove of aether existence or whatever such memes try to achieve is a plain idiocy.

Nobody removed aether from periodic table, because it was never in it since the beginning.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] -1 points 216 days ago +1 / -2

So what!! I fed your red herring and you continue??? What a waste of precious life!! I was showing you why someone put the meme that way. It was removed from science period. It doesn't fucking matter about the periodic table.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– CrazyRussian 4 points 216 days ago +4 / -0

Nice. Nobody want to study physical properties of aether, so it is still just another hypothetical concept just like "dark matter" or "Higgs field". Shitloads of talks and math, without any practical study or even physical proof of existence. There are a lot of exactly same things in modern science, aether is just one of the first. It is kind of normal today - invent things you could write a lot of articles about and do a math masturbation endlessly, but without any attempt to study and use practically.

So, OK, 19th century "dark matter". Something abstract, that somehow "should exist" but inherently could not be used or even studied practically. Nothing exceptional.

Then why do you need spreading of that fucking blatant lie about "removing aether from periodic table"? What's the point of meme you posted?

I'm in no way against any concept by default. But when concept apologists don't even care about anything practical about their concept, it is at least suspicious.

When I apply perfectly scientific and valid question - "was the thing isolated?" to the coronahoax, f.e., then it's OK. But if I apply exactly same question to, say, aether, or another thing circulating in conspiracy theorist circles, that's generate tons of butthurt.

Not isolated, never studied practically, inherently could not be used. And with that stupid and completely unnecessary lies on top. Sorry, I will not buy that theory, just like I will not buy "dark matter" or "relativity", or whatever abstract shit in physics. Even if the math is perfectly OK.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 0 points 216 days ago +1 / -1

Aether is composed of living beings. It is life. 17th century medicine approached it in the human and left it the same way. It's literally couterspace......the opposite of a "thing"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CrazyRussian 2 points 216 days ago +2 / -0

Life is real. So everything that make it is absolutely real too. Everything real have physical properties.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - ptjlq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy