Get behind me Satan.
(media.scored.co)
Comments (8)
sorted by:
That verse always reminds me of this
https://youtu.be/D2y6DMJQaeQ
From born in East L.A.
Trust binds; thrust frees... from push (inception towards death) to shove (life), hence being (choice) tempted by pull (want), while being shoved (need).
T(h)RUST...what if the "h" is silent? What if H (phonetic age/aiw - "vital force") implies the sound of silence? If an off-spring screams after birth, then was one still-born before choosing to make noise?
From the guy who thinks we can discard the Book of Revelation because "The Council of Nicea".
Discard the Book of Revelation because :
FICTION
I always wondered why nobody ever started a cult for ol' Nostradamus. Seriously. People are just THAT fucking stupid.
You so know that King James was a freemason, right?
So you also know that freemasons are AT BEST occult and DEFINITELY not living in "Christlike" ways, right?
1 + 1 = 2 even in the Bible
So what the fuck are you doing, bro?
Sounds to me like you aren't nearly as brilliant as you think you are.
Just saying
Aka nostra (our) damus/dido/deh (to give) which implies singular giving self up to plural. Our implies a possessive, hence only taking in...not giving out.
Aka fict (to shape) ion (action). Before one can shape action...action (inception towards death) shapes re-actions (life), hence "be-fore" aka forwarding being.
Ones RE-sponse to ALL action implies re-al.
Re (response) vela (velare; veil; cover) tion (action). Action generates reactions by setting each one free from one another, hence enabling each being to react to one another, while acted upon.
A suggested book binds ones free will of choice in-between covers...if consented to.
a) You vs me + was (perceivable) vs is (suggested) + right vs wrong imply conflicts of reason aka a cover a mason tempts ones free will of choice into.
b) King implies rule/reg - "to move in a straight line", hence each one within the king-dom of god being (life) moved within a straight line (inception towards death) aka king (motion) generating DOM (momentum) to set FREE (matter).
c) James/jacob/ya'aqobh - "to supplant; dispossess, acquire (a position from someone) by strategy or scheming" implies a jew speaking (suggestion) in the name of god (perceivable) to disposes gentiles (perception).
d) A mason of free (will of choice) utilizes suggestion as bricks and consent as mortar to build walls of ignorance within others.
All perceivable moving through each ones perception implies linear thinking...turning against others within conflicts of reason (best vs worse) implies circular logic.
Circular logic occults thinking straight...
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within. The separation of all into each one implies christ (to anoint), while ignoring self (singular) for others (plural) equalizes natural differences by artificially making them alike one another.
The foundation for ignoring self for others is based on JESUS (je suis; i am), hence one claiming for self by taking from another, which establishes the YOU (phonetic jew)...the merchant of temptation giving what one wants to take for the price of ones soul/sole (one and only).
a) All implies equal; each one within implies differentiated from one another.
b) Only within all can one be added (inception), subtracted (death); multiplied (intercourse) and divided (status quo of being one).
c) 1 (a chosen ones suggestion) + 1 (ones consent) = 2 (dualism)...the resulting conflict of reason among consenting ones implies a DUAL/DUEL.
a) Sound towards me implies a differentiation of all into one.
b) Me implies one holding onto self, while ignoring that sound differentiates each one from one another.
c) Ignoring all (perceivable) implies for one another (suggested), which makes anyone consenting to a suggestion "alike" one another.
I mean ..really?
I love how you couldn't resist breaking down (in such an odd way) "sounds to me like"
WTF man?
You GOTTA have more important things to do.
Oddities (life) within even (inception towards death)...that's what sound generates.
Breaking apart resists the temptation of holding together. Why is "sounds alike" such an easy rhetoric to use when drawing comparisons? Could it be a temptation?
One (perception) got all (perceivable)...there cannot be more than all, nor can one have all aka take possession of it, while being divided by it (per sonos; by sound) and in it (in-sanus; within sound).
a) IN (inception) PORT/PART (life) EX (death) aka partial within whole coming in and out.
b) Import and export implies linear progression...more vs less implies circular stagnation during linear progression.
As a partial within whole, what could be more important than breaking apart aka sustaining self? Off-spring implies breaking apart...coming into being sounds important.
Meet the fuckers... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger_family (The last name was originally spelled "Fucker")
That's the origin of "fuck" aka fuge (masonic joint)...which is what a mason does to ones free will of choice by tempting consent with suggestion.
im good, dont need to trust a book