No, really, if you think about it, the whole idea is quite absurd! Why on earth would they decide such matters right in the spotlight of general public? Why would they announce for the whole world to see and hear at first the meeting itself, then all that happens there, then reached conclusions?
I don't know about others, but If I'd be the one actually deciding future of nations, I wouldn't do any of that in the public. Absolutely nothing of importance would be done in the public. Even more, I would pretty much prefer, that public doesn't even know about me that I exist...
Which most probably is the actual case. Nothing of importance is being announced in the news unless it's not planned and those clowns at those meetings are not the ones who actually decide anything. Simple as that.
To clarify on the Edmonds things, she was supposed to take out Beeley and Bartlett. You can read their Syria reporting yourself and it's dynamite.
But such things were not Edmonds normal assignment and maybe her handler was out of town and couldn't write it up for her, who could possibly know. The job was an utter botch and everyone who was paying attention to her noticed. Totally and completely off-base and unprovoked. The "nervous breakdown" line seem to be the cover story they went with, which I find about as convincing as "holding it for a friend".
Corbett definitely says explicitly "there's no one at the top" now. It was probably within the last year that I heard it because it really caught my attention. It would have been in the free audio he publishes, but I never saved the specific link and timecode.
And I never saved the specific link and timecode because after a while it's like trying to keep track of exactly which neighborhood raccoons are getting into the dog food. In addition to the tedium of it, virtually no one will ever be interested in that particular data.
So what would I say happened with that point of view? Well, it's not like Corbett is in the CIA's HR system and gets mailed a weekly paycheck. Everything is influence from the top to the bottom: do the "right thing" and "good luck" will flow your way. No, these things are not right and it's it not luck but orchestration.
If Corbett previously held a different view, well, now those upwards of him no longer consider that the "right thing". A "good friend" mentions it to him, has a discussion, wonders if James has really thought it through because this friend leans towards a different view. And this friend has never steered him wrong before. Good things kept happening, didn't they?
I'm not claiming this is precisely what happened. I'm saying it's just that easy.
This is actually a very important topic. How exactly some conspiracy happens? How do they manage it? Usually the second thing normies say (right after ever popular question: "who are they?") is: "This conspiracy can't be true because all of them would have to be in on it and everyone would have to keep a secret." Well, no, not all of them have to be in on it and not everyone has to have the full picture for some conspiracy to work.
Basically there are two ways of managing something. One is direct management. (Like, say, a company with departments, managers etc.) The other one is indirect management. First one is what normies have in mind when they dismiss some conspiracy as impossible. Second one is how it is actually done. More like tending a garden and less like managing a company. When you tend a garden you don't directly tell every flower which way to grow. No, you just water it, tend to soil and make some small adjustments here and there... and that's about it. The garden grows by itself. This is how I see most conspiracies working. They just push the right buttons at the right time. Sure, they most probably do have some key people in key positions, but for the most part conspiracy works out by itself.
Now, wouldn't this mean that even if Corbett is a gatekeeper, he himself might not be entirely aware of it? Even if he has some minder attached, it doesn't necessarily mean he consciously knows about it...
Hmm, I haven't noticed it... I'll keep this in mind and pay attention next time watching his videos.