Water is the prism, have you not ever made a rainbow by spraying your water hose into the air? And the arch is always the same just different center locations because all rainbows would be circles if the ground did not get in the way and the angle of the sun determines the center.
If you don't see the flaw in the experiment, there may be no help for you. But since you're just a lame ass negative Nelly, I'll just assume you didn't even watch it.
It's ones consent to suggested scientism, which tempts one to take/seize the suggested into ones mind/memory, hence establishing a prison/prism.
Now what about a natural prism? A solid (life) whose bases (inception) or ends (death) are similar, equal, and parallel aka a trilateral column. What's a column? A projection aka a hill (life) to die on (inception towards death).
a) Flat implies a shape; measured by those within a prism of light. It's light which represents the earth/eorΓΎe - "soil" for each shape of seed within.
Soil/soeul/sueil aka sole and soul implies the threshold aka the doorway for each dweller passing through.
b) Flat vs round implies "circular" logic within self "turning" into a conflict of reason against others.
c) To know implies perceivable moving through perception...a flat line allowing a learning curvature to emerge.
a) Line was perceivable before a flat shape can be observed by ones perception, which only then can be described by suggestion to another.
Does the one perceiving need to use suggestion to describe all perceivable to another ones perception...or does this sound like a fucked up thing to do?
b) Just implies "even"; being able to observe implies being at "odds" with what one observes. What happens if odd (choice) within even (balance) chooses to hold onto a side within a conflict (round vs flat)...imbalanced odds.
How could I even start to talk about the complex deceptions a jew is suggesting, when gentiles continue to fail at the base of being odd (perception) within even (perceivable)?
The link above has the following quote: "Balance isn't something you find; but something you create"...how could I describe the contradiction in this to a gentile who willingly ignores being choice within balance of nature?
there is no other way to describe it
What if there's only one way (inception towards death) for each one within (life), which doesn't have to be described, since it implies an ongoing line, sentencing each life towards point of death?
And if a gentile chooses to ignore this basic feat of self discernment, how could I ever inspire him to question why scribe implies a "professional interpreter of the jewish law"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/scribe
Are you really sure that you need to de-SCRIBE anything to anyone else...or could it be a jew who scribbles within reality to distract gentiles with fiction?
unless you use symbols to talk
What if letters shaped into words imply the symbols used to talk?
What if shaping LETTERS into words for talking requires ones free will of choice LETTING a chosen one shape suggestions aka crafting spells?
Just being (life) within a line (inception towards death)...if only descriptions by scribes wouldn't be such a distraction, then one could discern this for self.
You don't need this at all. I'm not sure if this proves anything. But the Earth doesn't curve because you can simply just use math and your observations. horizon doesn't curve
Water is the prism, have you not ever made a rainbow by spraying your water hose into the air? And the arch is always the same just different center locations because all rainbows would be circles if the ground did not get in the way and the angle of the sun determines the center.
Why are the ones in Antarctica low and wide compared to the ones in Canada?
I'm in Canada and all the rainbows I've witnessed here arch high in the sky...never seen one like this like in Antarctica
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Antarctica%20rainbows&ko=-1&ia=images&iax=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.fineartamerica.com%2Fimages-medium-large-5%2Fantarctica-full-rainbow-gerlach-strait-george-theodore.jpg
No it's not. Your water rainbow wont work indoors. Why does it need a mirror indoors and not outdoors.
The prism is water, can people use common sense instead of listening to just another tattooed shirtless random retard?
I can literally make a rainbow with a garden hose on a sunny day.
wHeRe'S tHe PriSm?
Does it work when you do it inside a building?
Common sense ..that's funny. Where the curve Mr common sense?
Says the guy who didn't even think before he typed. Lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24GfgNtnjXc <--- Veritasium explains why you're a flat-earth retard.
If you don't see the flaw in the experiment, there may be no help for you. But since you're just a lame ass negative Nelly, I'll just assume you didn't even watch it.
There's no help for him
Prism/prison, hence imprisonment (within prison of mind). So what's a prison? Prison/pris - "to take; seize"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/prison
It's ones consent to suggested scientism, which tempts one to take/seize the suggested into ones mind/memory, hence establishing a prison/prism.
Now what about a natural prism? A solid (life) whose bases (inception) or ends (death) are similar, equal, and parallel aka a trilateral column. What's a column? A projection aka a hill (life) to die on (inception towards death).
Shut up you know the earth is flat
a) Flat implies a shape; measured by those within a prism of light. It's light which represents the earth/eorΓΎe - "soil" for each shape of seed within.
Soil/soeul/sueil aka sole and soul implies the threshold aka the doorway for each dweller passing through.
b) Flat vs round implies "circular" logic within self "turning" into a conflict of reason against others.
c) To know implies perceivable moving through perception...a flat line allowing a learning curvature to emerge.
Flat is just the observation and there is no other way to describe it, unless you use symbols to talk, and then it would just be a line
a) Line was perceivable before a flat shape can be observed by ones perception, which only then can be described by suggestion to another.
Does the one perceiving need to use suggestion to describe all perceivable to another ones perception...or does this sound like a fucked up thing to do?
b) Just implies "even"; being able to observe implies being at "odds" with what one observes. What happens if odd (choice) within even (balance) chooses to hold onto a side within a conflict (round vs flat)...imbalanced odds.
https://towardsai.net/p/l/logistic-regressions-journey-with-imbalanced-data
How could I even start to talk about the complex deceptions a jew is suggesting, when gentiles continue to fail at the base of being odd (perception) within even (perceivable)?
The link above has the following quote: "Balance isn't something you find; but something you create"...how could I describe the contradiction in this to a gentile who willingly ignores being choice within balance of nature?
What if there's only one way (inception towards death) for each one within (life), which doesn't have to be described, since it implies an ongoing line, sentencing each life towards point of death?
And if a gentile chooses to ignore this basic feat of self discernment, how could I ever inspire him to question why scribe implies a "professional interpreter of the jewish law"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/scribe
Are you really sure that you need to de-SCRIBE anything to anyone else...or could it be a jew who scribbles within reality to distract gentiles with fiction?
What if letters shaped into words imply the symbols used to talk?
What if shaping LETTERS into words for talking requires ones free will of choice LETTING a chosen one shape suggestions aka crafting spells?
What if a jew suggests the symbolism of letters to trick consenting gentiles to become letters aka "whisper words of wisdom; let it be"... https://genius.com/The-beatles-let-it-be-lyrics
Just being (life) within a line (inception towards death)...if only descriptions by scribes wouldn't be such a distraction, then one could discern this for self.
You don't need this at all. I'm not sure if this proves anything. But the Earth doesn't curve because you can simply just use math and your observations. horizon doesn't curve
Disagree. There's no one else so unequivocably wrong about stuff for me to laugh at.
You just fell for the flat earth Psy up, sucker
In a perfect world conspiracy theorist wouldn't be such sheep