a) Line was perceivable before a flat shape can be observed by ones perception, which only then can be described by suggestion to another.
Does the one perceiving need to use suggestion to describe all perceivable to another ones perception...or does this sound like a fucked up thing to do?
b) Just implies "even"; being able to observe implies being at "odds" with what one observes. What happens if odd (choice) within even (balance) chooses to hold onto a side within a conflict (round vs flat)...imbalanced odds.
How could I even start to talk about the complex deceptions a jew is suggesting, when gentiles continue to fail at the base of being odd (perception) within even (perceivable)?
The link above has the following quote: "Balance isn't something you find; but something you create"...how could I describe the contradiction in this to a gentile who willingly ignores being choice within balance of nature?
there is no other way to describe it
What if there's only one way (inception towards death) for each one within (life), which doesn't have to be described, since it implies an ongoing line, sentencing each life towards point of death?
And if a gentile chooses to ignore this basic feat of self discernment, how could I ever inspire him to question why scribe implies a "professional interpreter of the jewish law"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/scribe
Are you really sure that you need to de-SCRIBE anything to anyone else...or could it be a jew who scribbles within reality to distract gentiles with fiction?
unless you use symbols to talk
What if letters shaped into words imply the symbols used to talk?
What if shaping LETTERS into words for talking requires ones free will of choice LETTING a chosen one shape suggestions aka crafting spells?
Just being (life) within a line (inception towards death)...if only descriptions by scribes wouldn't be such a distraction, then one could discern this for self.
Flat is just the observation and there is no other way to describe it, unless you use symbols to talk, and then it would just be a line
a) Line was perceivable before a flat shape can be observed by ones perception, which only then can be described by suggestion to another.
Does the one perceiving need to use suggestion to describe all perceivable to another ones perception...or does this sound like a fucked up thing to do?
b) Just implies "even"; being able to observe implies being at "odds" with what one observes. What happens if odd (choice) within even (balance) chooses to hold onto a side within a conflict (round vs flat)...imbalanced odds.
https://towardsai.net/p/l/logistic-regressions-journey-with-imbalanced-data
How could I even start to talk about the complex deceptions a jew is suggesting, when gentiles continue to fail at the base of being odd (perception) within even (perceivable)?
The link above has the following quote: "Balance isn't something you find; but something you create"...how could I describe the contradiction in this to a gentile who willingly ignores being choice within balance of nature?
What if there's only one way (inception towards death) for each one within (life), which doesn't have to be described, since it implies an ongoing line, sentencing each life towards point of death?
And if a gentile chooses to ignore this basic feat of self discernment, how could I ever inspire him to question why scribe implies a "professional interpreter of the jewish law"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/scribe
Are you really sure that you need to de-SCRIBE anything to anyone else...or could it be a jew who scribbles within reality to distract gentiles with fiction?
What if letters shaped into words imply the symbols used to talk?
What if shaping LETTERS into words for talking requires ones free will of choice LETTING a chosen one shape suggestions aka crafting spells?
What if a jew suggests the symbolism of letters to trick consenting gentiles to become letters aka "whisper words of wisdom; let it be"... https://genius.com/The-beatles-let-it-be-lyrics
Just being (life) within a line (inception towards death)...if only descriptions by scribes wouldn't be such a distraction, then one could discern this for self.