a) Non isn't active, but reactive aka a beings choice of ignoring activity.
b) Dynamic implies fluid; static implies solid within fluid...not as suggested "having no motion; being at rest; quiescent; fixed; stationary".
It's ones consent to any suggested information, which "affixes" it within ones mind/memory, hence tempting ones ignorance to pretend to be static. This in return permits those suggesting to define/redefine and contradict what dynamic means or not.
c) Human aka hue (color) of man implies the visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion) for each ray (matter) within.
Few suggest a conflict...human vs animal to distract many from discerning self to be animated within the hue of man.
This conflict among many is called "reason", and within each is called "logic" aka circular thinking aka static ignoring dynamic.
a) Non isn't active, but reactive aka a beings choice of ignoring activity.
b) Dynamic implies fluid; static implies solid within fluid...not as suggested "having no motion; being at rest; quiescent; fixed; stationary".
It's ones consent to any suggested information, which "affixes" it within ones mind/memory, hence tempting ones ignorance to pretend to be static. This in return permits those suggesting to define/redefine and contradict what dynamic means or not.
c) Human aka hue (color) of man implies the visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion) for each ray (matter) within.
Few suggest a conflict...human vs animal to distract many from discerning self to be animated within the hue of man.
This conflict among many is called "reason", and within each is called "logic" aka circular thinking aka static ignoring dynamic.
Ones ignorance (dark) occults/conceals ones discernment (light).
a) Suggested homo (same) tempts one to ignore being differentiated (life) during sameness (inception towards death).
b) Sapience (discernment) implies the division (dis) of each ones perceiving (cern) mind (ment) from one another.
Homo (same) inverts sapience (different).
always interesting always appreciated.