There is no point in continuing if you can’t learn anything :(
[buzzwords only paid jewish shills have ever said]
I know “gish gallop” is a bit obscure, but when you don’t know what something means, you should just look it up! Don’t choose to remain ignorant shouting “jewish shill” at the top of your lungs instead. It’s bad for your continuing education.
In order for the value that the “Eratosthenes experiment” (I keep putting this in quotes because it is both not an experiment, and likely not from Eratosthenes) produces to be a circumference of a spherical world, the world has to first BE spherical.
Thanks for admitting the Earth is spherical, as proven by every single instance of the experiment being run. You didn’t even pretend to answer the question. You didn’t define the parameters. You didn’t outline other, alternative experiments. You didn’t explain how the experiment run was itself wrong. You have no accounting or explanation for the nature of the results given, by anyone, anywhere on Earth, running the experiment for themselves. You have no response whatsoever. The question remains unanswered because you are physically incapable of answering it as doing so would destroy your hoax.
That’s one. Where’s the other one.
I know “gish gallop” is a bit obscure, but when you don’t know what something means, you should just look it up!
The subhuman paid jewish shill sees a statement that could not exist without an explicit understanding of something and instantly replies claiming a lack of understanding. Will wonders never cease.
Spoken like a true thinker. Never change tallest shill, never change.
as proven by every single instance of the experiment being run
Can you really not read? You know what else can’t read… bots :(
Please go back and reread my answer. Eratosthenes’ procedure cannot, does not, and was never intended to prove anything about the shape of the world. It merely assumes the world is spherical (and several other things) and then seeks to estimate a circumference ASSUMING that is correct. Assuming cannot equal proving. Aren’t you the one always mindlessly babbling about “truth”? What truth is there in mistaking mere assumption with “proving”?
Look up gish gallop.
I’d be happy to end yours at any moment.
Only cowards fear learning, and only the belligerent want to stifle learning in others. Surely you don’t want to be either of those things… Right?
Eratosthenes’ procedure cannot, does not, and was never intended to prove anything about the shape of the world.
Did, though.
Assuming cannot equal proving.
Maybe if you’d stop assuming the Earth was flat you could prove it.
Aren’t you the one always mindlessly babbling about “truth”?
Aren’t you the one always claiming that you have any evidence whatsoever of your proven jewish hoax?
What truth is there in mistaking mere assumption with “proving”?
What truth is there in claiming something that only paid jewish shills have ever said?
Look up gish gallop.
Look up fentanyl overdosing. You’re not human and never will be. Every single thing I said is objectively, unquestionably true. That doesn’t mean it’s all false because you can’t refute even one point of it.
It’s done (https://communities.win/c/flatearthresearch/p/19Ae3vDlJM/discussion-with-tallestskil--que/c). I guess you can just go ahead and remove those 2 questions from your copypasta list (and then we can move on to the rest of them, one by one), but I thought you might want to respond to the answers given first.
There is no point in continuing if you can’t learn anything :(
I know “gish gallop” is a bit obscure, but when you don’t know what something means, you should just look it up! Don’t choose to remain ignorant shouting “jewish shill” at the top of your lungs instead. It’s bad for your continuing education.
Nah, drink bleach.
Thanks for admitting the Earth is spherical, as proven by every single instance of the experiment being run. You didn’t even pretend to answer the question. You didn’t define the parameters. You didn’t outline other, alternative experiments. You didn’t explain how the experiment run was itself wrong. You have no accounting or explanation for the nature of the results given, by anyone, anywhere on Earth, running the experiment for themselves. You have no response whatsoever. The question remains unanswered because you are physically incapable of answering it as doing so would destroy your hoax.
That’s one. Where’s the other one.
The subhuman paid jewish shill sees a statement that could not exist without an explicit understanding of something and instantly replies claiming a lack of understanding. Will wonders never cease.
I’ve never been ignorant of your kikery.
I’d be happy to end yours at any moment.
Spoken like a true thinker. Never change tallest shill, never change.
Can you really not read? You know what else can’t read… bots :(
Please go back and reread my answer. Eratosthenes’ procedure cannot, does not, and was never intended to prove anything about the shape of the world. It merely assumes the world is spherical (and several other things) and then seeks to estimate a circumference ASSUMING that is correct. Assuming cannot equal proving. Aren’t you the one always mindlessly babbling about “truth”? What truth is there in mistaking mere assumption with “proving”?
Look up gish gallop.
Only cowards fear learning, and only the belligerent want to stifle learning in others. Surely you don’t want to be either of those things… Right?
Did, though.
Maybe if you’d stop assuming the Earth was flat you could prove it.
Aren’t you the one always claiming that you have any evidence whatsoever of your proven jewish hoax?
What truth is there in claiming something that only paid jewish shills have ever said?
Look up fentanyl overdosing. You’re not human and never will be. Every single thing I said is objectively, unquestionably true. That doesn’t mean it’s all false because you can’t refute even one point of it.
2+2=4. Stick a fork in a toaster, yid.