Why can everyone south of the equator see the exact same stars rotating in the same direction around the same fixed central point in the sky due south of them if they’re supposedly all looking in different directions?
Why are the distances between degrees of latitude uniform and don’t grow exponentially away from the equator?
Why does everyone on Earth get the same result for the Eratosthenes experiment, when people nearer the equator should get a much smaller circumference for the Earth than those nearer the poles?
Come to think of it, was Eratosthenes part of the “round Earth” conspiracy?
Surviving records show that the ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians based their astronomical forecasts on calculations assuming the Earth is a globe. Did this conspiracy begin at the dawn of civilization, or are all ancient artifacts nothing but Victorian forgeries? If so, why has this never been detected by modern carbon-dating techniques?
Why do arc lengths of given angles of longitude decrease rather than increase south of the equator?
Why does the sun not rise in the northeast and set in the northwest, year round, for everyone on Earth?
Why DOES the sun set, when the law of perspective states that the angular size of the sun’s altitude, like everything else, can’t become negative?
Why does the sun’s angular size not change throughout the day or year, since it is “moving toward and away from us” and is “closer than we’re told”?
Seriously, did you fall asleep during geometry class, or are you just completely demented?
If you believe in zeteticism, why do you keep relying on magical and unprovable solutions, which can’t be shown to exist with your own eyes and clearly don’t exist at all? Apparently, zeteticism is just code for “make any old bullshit up and pretend it’s true.”
If all photographs of a round Earth are a hoax, why not simply create photographs of a flat Earth?
A property of mass is that it has gravitational force regardless of size. If the Earth did not have a gravitational field, wouldn’t that imply that the Earth doesn’t physically exist?
Where is the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station located if the south “pole” is the whole circumference of the Earth?
Wouldn’t creating such elaborate fakes and conspiracies cost an equal–if not greater–amount of money than the science they are supposedly covering up?
The idea of the Earth as a sphere has existed at least since the time of the ancient Greeks, long before NASA. What were their financial motives?
What financial motives could NASA have, since their budget is still cut every year?
How could the sun be a spotlight if it is a sphere? On the flat Earth, the light projection would have to be a semicircle.
Why does the North Star goes to the horizon?
Why do constellations appear to be different in the Southern and Northern hemispheres?
Why is the Coriolis effect stronger near both poles, instead of stronger in the north and weaker in the south?
If the circumferential south pole is preventing the oceans from pouring over the edge of the flat Earth, why didn’t the oceans disappear during the incredible amount of time it would have taken for that ice to form?
If the oceans would–if they could–pour off the edge of the flat Earth, where, then, would they go? Does this mean that whatever keeps the oceans on the surface of the flat Earth only operates in a downward direction on the uppermost surface and is absent on the underneath?
Why are satellites visible from Earth with a pair of binoculars and even the naked eye?
How could a flat body maintain an atmosphere?
Why are other celestial bodies spheres but the Earth is not? How, and why, was the Earth created differently?
Thank you for admitting the Earth is not flat. You have conceded the argument again. The questions will continue to be posted every single time you make a submission here, solely to humiliate you and destroy any chance you have of tricking people into your jewish bullshit. Do not make submissions here.
There is no point in continuing if you can’t learn anything :(
[buzzwords only paid jewish shills have ever said]
I know “gish gallop” is a bit obscure, but when you don’t know what something means, you should just look it up! Don’t choose to remain ignorant shouting “jewish shill” at the top of your lungs instead. It’s bad for your continuing education.
In order for the value that the “Eratosthenes experiment” (I keep putting this in quotes because it is both not an experiment, and likely not from Eratosthenes) produces to be a circumference of a spherical world, the world has to first BE spherical.
Thanks for admitting the Earth is spherical, as proven by every single instance of the experiment being run. You didn’t even pretend to answer the question. You didn’t define the parameters. You didn’t outline other, alternative experiments. You didn’t explain how the experiment run was itself wrong. You have no accounting or explanation for the nature of the results given, by anyone, anywhere on Earth, running the experiment for themselves. You have no response whatsoever. The question remains unanswered because you are physically incapable of answering it as doing so would destroy your hoax.
That’s one. Where’s the other one.
I know “gish gallop” is a bit obscure, but when you don’t know what something means, you should just look it up!
The subhuman paid jewish shill sees a statement that could not exist without an explicit understanding of something and instantly replies claiming a lack of understanding. Will wonders never cease.
Spoken like a true thinker. Never change tallest shill, never change.
as proven by every single instance of the experiment being run
Can you really not read? You know what else can’t read… bots :(
Please go back and reread my answer. Eratosthenes’ procedure cannot, does not, and was never intended to prove anything about the shape of the world. It merely assumes the world is spherical (and several other things) and then seeks to estimate a circumference ASSUMING that is correct. Assuming cannot equal proving. Aren’t you the one always mindlessly babbling about “truth”? What truth is there in mistaking mere assumption with “proving”?
Look up gish gallop.
I’d be happy to end yours at any moment.
Only cowards fear learning, and only the belligerent want to stifle learning in others. Surely you don’t want to be either of those things… Right?
Eratosthenes’ procedure cannot, does not, and was never intended to prove anything about the shape of the world.
Did, though.
Assuming cannot equal proving.
Maybe if you’d stop assuming the Earth was flat you could prove it.
Aren’t you the one always mindlessly babbling about “truth”?
Aren’t you the one always claiming that you have any evidence whatsoever of your proven jewish hoax?
What truth is there in mistaking mere assumption with “proving”?
What truth is there in claiming something that only paid jewish shills have ever said?
Look up gish gallop.
Look up fentanyl overdosing. You’re not human and never will be. Every single thing I said is objectively, unquestionably true. That doesn’t mean it’s all false because you can’t refute even one point of it.
As I said before, we are in agreement that the flat earth psyop is a heavily advertised (i.e. funded) hoax.
The primary purpose of the psyop is to prevent earnest discussion or research into the topic (because it is valuable to study), just like many (if not most) things labeled “conspiracy theory”.
Your view that it is funded to undermine white achievement only makes sense if it actually convinced people the world was flat and space were a hoax. In reality, it overwhelmingly does the opposite because it is designed to. It comes across as so flagrantly and offensively stupid by design.
It’s extremely well advertised, whatever you care to call it.
To literally get people to waste their time with it.
Then it would be engaging and entertaining, but generally speaking - it is neither. The vast majority, including yourself, are neither engaged nor entertained by it. If its purpose is “wasting peoples’ time” (like virtually all mass media is, by the by), then whoever is spending so much advertising it is wasting large amounts of money.
So stop promoting it.
I don’t! I promote earnest discussion and diligent research of the topic it is funded to suppress. Most people, including yourself, are utterly incapable of objectively evaluating the simple question “what is the shape of the earth” without abject appeal to authority and, typically, frequent ad hominem.
They mindlessly parrot things they were erroneously taught (“teacher told me so”), like that Eratosthenes and/or Columbus proved the world was round - both of which are laughably untrue and easy to objectively disconfirm with minutes worth of research. In general this is due to conditioning by rote, under the guise of education, from childhood.
I promote against the lazy parroting of erroneous “facts” and against belief masquerading as knowledge. I promote critical thinking and autodidacticism.
Fucking flat-headed smooth-brained glownigger.
It's because of the lens.
Did you just say look at the stars to see the shape of the earth?
Did you just fail to answer a single question about your proven jewish hoax yet again?
Listen you little bitch. I answered the 1st one.
How the fuck does looking at the stars tell you the shape of the earth?
One is enough? Here's #2 since your such a piece of shit.
How do shadows on a shape tell you the shape?
No wonder flat earthers never go to the next step! Fucking round eyes.
Didn’t happen.
Too retarded to be considered a human being, confirmed.
Too retarded to have passed middle school geometry.
Because you’re too stupid to do so, yeah.
No, see, you dont even English.
Thank you for admitting the Earth is not flat. You have conceded the argument again. The questions will continue to be posted every single time you make a submission here, solely to humiliate you and destroy any chance you have of tricking people into your jewish bullshit. Do not make submissions here.
That's not what flat earth means. Shill dog. If you haven't figured that out by now you're definitely the enemy. All retards are.
I’ve answered two of these and created a thread for them.
Awaiting your earnest response before moving on to the rest of your copypasta Gish gallop.
Good for you. Let me know how it turns out. When it’s done.
Oof yikes, that’s a big fucky wucky on your part!
It’s done (https://communities.win/c/flatearthresearch/p/19Ae3vDlJM/discussion-with-tallestskil--que/c). I guess you can just go ahead and remove those 2 questions from your copypasta list (and then we can move on to the rest of them, one by one), but I thought you might want to respond to the answers given first.
There is no point in continuing if you can’t learn anything :(
I know “gish gallop” is a bit obscure, but when you don’t know what something means, you should just look it up! Don’t choose to remain ignorant shouting “jewish shill” at the top of your lungs instead. It’s bad for your continuing education.
Nah, drink bleach.
Thanks for admitting the Earth is spherical, as proven by every single instance of the experiment being run. You didn’t even pretend to answer the question. You didn’t define the parameters. You didn’t outline other, alternative experiments. You didn’t explain how the experiment run was itself wrong. You have no accounting or explanation for the nature of the results given, by anyone, anywhere on Earth, running the experiment for themselves. You have no response whatsoever. The question remains unanswered because you are physically incapable of answering it as doing so would destroy your hoax.
That’s one. Where’s the other one.
The subhuman paid jewish shill sees a statement that could not exist without an explicit understanding of something and instantly replies claiming a lack of understanding. Will wonders never cease.
I’ve never been ignorant of your kikery.
I’d be happy to end yours at any moment.
Spoken like a true thinker. Never change tallest shill, never change.
Can you really not read? You know what else can’t read… bots :(
Please go back and reread my answer. Eratosthenes’ procedure cannot, does not, and was never intended to prove anything about the shape of the world. It merely assumes the world is spherical (and several other things) and then seeks to estimate a circumference ASSUMING that is correct. Assuming cannot equal proving. Aren’t you the one always mindlessly babbling about “truth”? What truth is there in mistaking mere assumption with “proving”?
Look up gish gallop.
Only cowards fear learning, and only the belligerent want to stifle learning in others. Surely you don’t want to be either of those things… Right?
Did, though.
Maybe if you’d stop assuming the Earth was flat you could prove it.
Aren’t you the one always claiming that you have any evidence whatsoever of your proven jewish hoax?
What truth is there in claiming something that only paid jewish shills have ever said?
Look up fentanyl overdosing. You’re not human and never will be. Every single thing I said is objectively, unquestionably true. That doesn’t mean it’s all false because you can’t refute even one point of it.
2+2=4. Stick a fork in a toaster, yid.
Reminder that this paid jewish shill has publicly admitted that flat Earth is a hoax and yet still spams it on this website.
The only one who spams your copypasta nonsense is you.
I was the one trying, vainly, to get you to recognize it for spam and to stop :(
Thanks for admitting Earth isn’t flat and your entire purpose on this website is to post proven hoaxes.
As I said before, we are in agreement that the flat earth psyop is a heavily advertised (i.e. funded) hoax.
The primary purpose of the psyop is to prevent earnest discussion or research into the topic (because it is valuable to study), just like many (if not most) things labeled “conspiracy theory”.
Your view that it is funded to undermine white achievement only makes sense if it actually convinced people the world was flat and space were a hoax. In reality, it overwhelmingly does the opposite because it is designed to. It comes across as so flagrantly and offensively stupid by design.
There is none. It’s a hoax. That’s the point of it being a hoax. To literally get people to waste their time with it.
So stop promoting it.
It’s extremely well advertised, whatever you care to call it.
Then it would be engaging and entertaining, but generally speaking - it is neither. The vast majority, including yourself, are neither engaged nor entertained by it. If its purpose is “wasting peoples’ time” (like virtually all mass media is, by the by), then whoever is spending so much advertising it is wasting large amounts of money.
I don’t! I promote earnest discussion and diligent research of the topic it is funded to suppress. Most people, including yourself, are utterly incapable of objectively evaluating the simple question “what is the shape of the earth” without abject appeal to authority and, typically, frequent ad hominem.
They mindlessly parrot things they were erroneously taught (“teacher told me so”), like that Eratosthenes and/or Columbus proved the world was round - both of which are laughably untrue and easy to objectively disconfirm with minutes worth of research. In general this is due to conditioning by rote, under the guise of education, from childhood.
I promote against the lazy parroting of erroneous “facts” and against belief masquerading as knowledge. I promote critical thinking and autodidacticism.
To anyone with earnest interest in the subject (including vehement hatred of it), please join us on c/flatearthresearch to exchange views!
More than likely, it isn’t what you think it is / have been advertised to believe it is.