This is how false dialectics are created. Let's take a step back and think about wtf the US or any other country that's not in the region cares about a local conflict over a piece of land? People get baited by emotional appeals and forget to look at the framing. There are no good argument in support for both Israel or Palestine.
Meh, I like how this "person" is wearing a "hamas lives matter" shirt.
No one is advocating for hamas, but israel genociding the Palestinian people so they can steal their "holy land" is something you think we would all stand against.
a) Dialect is shaped by ones consent to another ones suggestion, hence one + one = two (dia). Lect/leg - "to collect" implies the collecting of consent through suggestions made by speech, hence legein - "to speak".
b) True vs false implies dialectical conflict of reason aka one versus a second one over a third ones suggestion..the third one isn't participating in the conflict, but controls both sides (reason) from outside the ring (circular logic).
c) Created implies ones consent to suggested creationism aka creation out of noting (creatio ex nihilo), which tempts one into a conflict of reason...everything vs nothing aka destruction vs creation.
wtf the US or any other country that's not in the region cares
US aka UNITED STATES implies a joining together of remote states...tricked to care/carry the burden of bondage.
to look at the framing
Sight is framed by eye...looking implies locking onto what others are showing, which narrows ones sight to what others are channeling, hence telling a vision channels.
argument in support
Nature withdraws support from arguing minds, while inspiring the need to resist the wanted temptation of arguing. Within a moving nature...resistance is fertile.
Argument implies resistance vs resistance...mutual infertility.
This is how false dialectics are created. Let's take a step back and think about wtf the US or any other country that's not in the region cares about a local conflict over a piece of land? People get baited by emotional appeals and forget to look at the framing. There are no good argument in support for both Israel or Palestine.
Meh, I like how this "person" is wearing a "hamas lives matter" shirt.
No one is advocating for hamas, but israel genociding the Palestinian people so they can steal their "holy land" is something you think we would all stand against.
Sure, but that's not the hill I'll die on. It's just as relevant as any other local conflict around the world.
a) Dialect is shaped by ones consent to another ones suggestion, hence one + one = two (dia). Lect/leg - "to collect" implies the collecting of consent through suggestions made by speech, hence legein - "to speak".
b) True vs false implies dialectical conflict of reason aka one versus a second one over a third ones suggestion..the third one isn't participating in the conflict, but controls both sides (reason) from outside the ring (circular logic).
c) Created implies ones consent to suggested creationism aka creation out of noting (creatio ex nihilo), which tempts one into a conflict of reason...everything vs nothing aka destruction vs creation.
US aka UNITED STATES implies a joining together of remote states...tricked to care/carry the burden of bondage.
Sight is framed by eye...looking implies locking onto what others are showing, which narrows ones sight to what others are channeling, hence telling a vision channels.
Nature withdraws support from arguing minds, while inspiring the need to resist the wanted temptation of arguing. Within a moving nature...resistance is fertile.
Argument implies resistance vs resistance...mutual infertility.
How does that make you feel Hal?