So after researching this thing up and down for a decade or so i guess i finally got a personal winner.
The snake was Enki, the fruit was sex (and knowledge perhaps of what the purpose of man was to be).
So man was being created to work the field and be eaten (Eloi ending) like we use horses for. Enki fucked that up and therefore the descendants of the gods (inbred elites) wanted him depicted as a snake because he was to them.
The god of that story is most likely Anu or Enlil.
Enlil used to be against creation of mankind (which they created starting from hominid and their own dna, as slave and food). He was the guy who opted for the flood to stop the nuisance later on.
It's clear (to me) history is suppressed right now, and that the sumerian myths hold lots of truth. Yes i know Sitchin is most likely an illuminati plant and he put some incorrectness in there for his other mates to call it all fake and discredit the whole story.
Enki was the only humanist among the 'gods' who wanted his creation to have a personal path aside mere slavery. Others just wanted slaves and decent food.
I was first put on the suspect this was the case when i read a jewish forum a decade or so ago where jewish scholars were confirming the two different dna story was real, meaning they know well their foundational myths and their real value but they are happy for others to believe in the christian understanding of the old testament.
An important side conclusion is to me that not even the elohim were good enough to make their own food in a lab, but needed to make it into a lifeform.
Another thing is that Enki was lord of the abyss and 'god' of wisdom. What does Jesus say of snakes? be wise as one. It seems a pretty easy take that that wasn't referencing an actual snake, but snakes got into the wisdom thing because of Enki portrayal in the story.
It's not the first reset since then and that's why i think one should entertain the idea the book was heavily modified since way before the greek translations.
I don't mean to offend anyone religious feelings but i just wanted some feedback on my own view.
I dont know mang, I subscribe to the more simpler story thats depicted on the cylinder seals.
They created us and we worshipped them as gods for it.
The snake is in a lot of the very ancient world. Göbekli Tepe. Quetzalcoatl.
There was a massive cataclysm at the end of the Younger Dryas, somewhere around 12,000 to 13,000 years ago.
I really subscribe to the theory that a comet likely broke up. Remember that comet in the 90s? You could see it for a few days from most of the planet. They light up the sky when they get that close. If a comet broke up and had four of five impacts, they would have hit glaciers in the Northern Hemisphere, absorbing the impact (so you wouldn't have impact craters).
It's though most of our ancient stories about the dangers of a Snake or "Sky Serpent" is really a long distorted memory of a comet. That includes the Genesis creation story.
There is something being covered up about this ancient story though. Göbekli Tepe has barely been excavated, and one only has to look at the organizations in charge to see why it's been stalled. Egypt also refuses to admit there are large chambers under the Spinx. There's something about our ancient world that heads of states know and don't want the world to find out about.
Aka taking (suggested) while ignoring what is offered (perceivable) for free (perception). You're still falling for the temptation of wanting to take the apple of forbidden knowledge into your possession.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) each being lives within a place that is well-watered throughout.
I believe one thing to be true and share it freely, therefore i fail. Should i just have no thoughts at all? Believe nothing? That would be a suggestion too. All you do in the end is suggesting. All you say is your own take. Do me a favor too.
Also, what would be an alternative?
a) To believe implies ones consent to the suggested information by another, while ignoring perceivable inspiration. Fundamentally...nature moves sound through each being; which many ignore by holding onto words shaped by few.
b) Nature implies moving balance giving each being within "free" will of choice. Sharing choices aka ones consent given to the suggestion of another, binds ones free will of choice to another.
c) Being implies temporary growth (life) during ongoing loss (inception towards death), hence continuously failing ones endeavors representing the struggle of being.
a) Should implies ones suggested question towards the suggested answer of another, while ignoring natures perceivable solution (inception towards death) to each problem (life).
b) No (nothing) implies the suggested inversion of all (everything) perceivable. Few suggest nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) to tempt consenting many to de-nial everything perceivable.
Nature doesn't offer "nothing"...each being within nature has the free will of choice to ignore everything perceivable for each others suggestions, with ignorance representing de-nial/nihilo - "nothing".
c) Thinking implies perceivable inspiration moving through each ones perception...not holding onto suggested information within ones mind/memory, while ignoring that nature moves.
Sound permits being to shape; words tempt being to hold onto shape.
Furthermore...sound moves "directly" through ones mind; while holding onto words establishes "circular" logic within ones mind. Direction implies motion; circular implies a shape within the direction of motion.
To believe implies holding onto suggested "nothing", while ignoring that everything perceivable moves through ones perception.
Suggestion represents temptation for being to willingly give consent, which then shapes artificial (information) within natural (inspiration).
Nature doesn't suggest, it moves perceivable through perception for each ones free will of choice to adapt to; draw from; shape within.
Alternative implies to alter (inception towards death) native (life)...ones consent to the suggested word "alternative" tempts one to affix its definition, hence contradicting alternation.
You simply didn't answer my question and are suggesting more and more.
Look for a mirror. Nevermind. Beware of one.
A question implies a quest towards outcome, which for life implies death. The seeking of answers turns one towards suggested outcome, and away from perceivable origin. Self discernment cannot be gained from another.
a) To look implies to lock, which narrows ones sight.
b) Being implies ray within spectrum of light...consenting to each others suggestions implies a reflection aka a mirror image aka sight through a looking glass.
What if trying to define Eden as a place outside of self, prevents one from discerning ones position within Eden?
Nice reasons not to answer. You got definitions, wow. Nothing new. Picture me impressed.
Oh yeah, picture: blablabla. Or will it be impressions?
Utilizing implication (if/then) over reason (vs) avoids conflicts like naughty vs nice or nothing vs everything or answer vs question.
Definition implies DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one who is deaf to sound (phonic) when consenting to words.
For example...suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable in sanus (within sound) and per sonos (by sound). That's how spell-craft works.
a) Nothing represents ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable, hence a jew suggesting gentiles to believe in "nothing"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
b) New/néwos - "now"...as perception within perceivable; one can only have presence NOW...not before (old) or after (new). Few suggest "new" to tempt many to ignore "now".
a) A suggested picture implies a captured moment, which in return tempts one to ignore perceivable moment-um of ongoing motion. Movies aka moving pictures are then artificially moving captured moments.
Few suggest actors under directors to distract many from discerning self as reactions (life) during direction (inception towards death).
b) Blablabla aka yadayadayada is a yiddish expression for "so on; and so forth" aka suggested progressivism tempting consenting gentiles to move forwards.
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6t8g6ka4W0 Notice the differentiation of shapes (life) during the same base line (inception towards death).
Nature impresses...
Hunger and thirst represent pressure (press) for each being within (im), hence natural law impressing (dying) expressions (living) simultaneously.