So true but yet so misunderstood. I am not a flat earther but I do use scientific method to disprove the theory of the globe. Not sure if people really understand how theories and testing them works. what is the default argument. Logical fallacies. Cute meme but still way over people's head.
Some people might get it , when I'llvaccines, but they wouldn't believe it applies to nuclear explosions, or scientific method can be used to disprove the globe, or the vegetables are actually not good for
Circular logic turns ones mind into conflicts of reason against others...that's the foundation of an arguing mind (argue-ment).
Not sure if people really understand...still way over people's head
Making sure implies seeking suggested assurances from others by consensual "standing-under"...that puts it way over people's heads.
In reality...over and under are in balance with one another. Artificially choosing to understand establishes a natural over-reaction.
scientific method
Science/scio - "to know; perceive"
Ficus/facere - "to make"
Met/meta/me - "in the middle"
Hod/hodos - "way"
Ones perception of all perceivable from within the middle (life) of the way (inception towards death). Suggested scientism tempts one to incline towards others aka decentralization.
Notice also metaphysics - "the science of the inward and essential nature of things"...suggestion implies outwards.
So true but yet so misunderstood. I am not a flat earther but I do use scientific method to disprove the theory of the globe. Not sure if people really understand how theories and testing them works. what is the default argument. Logical fallacies. Cute meme but still way over people's head.
Some people might get it , when I'llvaccines, but they wouldn't believe it applies to nuclear explosions, or scientific method can be used to disprove the globe, or the vegetables are actually not good for
Vegetables are not good?
What's your take on evolution?
Circular logic turns ones mind into conflicts of reason against others...that's the foundation of an arguing mind (argue-ment).
Making sure implies seeking suggested assurances from others by consensual "standing-under"...that puts it way over people's heads.
In reality...over and under are in balance with one another. Artificially choosing to understand establishes a natural over-reaction.
Ones perception of all perceivable from within the middle (life) of the way (inception towards death). Suggested scientism tempts one to incline towards others aka decentralization.
Notice also metaphysics - "the science of the inward and essential nature of things"...suggestion implies outwards.