Most women would rather be Elon's 3rd wife rather than the only wife of a Walmart shift manager.
If plural marriage ever becomes legal, it will have massive dysgenic consequences. Older men, the ones with the money, have lower quality sperm. Even if they are banging young hotties, this leads to a decline in the quality of the offspring.
Luckily, plural marriage isn't normal, nor are there that many billionaires with impregnation fetishes.
Lastly, without some sort of primogeniture, it wouldn't be long until you had some sort of violence issues.
Just like how you'd go finding anything to be true - you investigate and look into what they teach. There are many religions true, but there are not that many basic philosophical positions on the nature of reality, of life, man and the universe and of universal concepts like logic, truth, knowledge, morality, math, etc. So you can group all religions in a couple of categories based on that. There's also historicity, consistency, cohesion within the religious system; how well does it justify and explain things we appeal to and necessitate in our day to day (like the universality of metaphysical concepts like the laws of logic for example).
The problem with atheists is they have a warped and straw-manned view about religion because of indoctrination. I was an atheist and thought I had it all figured out but I was at the peak of Dunning-Kruger and about to take a plunge. I never gave it a serious chance and any complex subject will look like bs with such a bad faith predisposition.
The red herring aside, you didn't answer my question. I'll shoot it straight - Christians are evolutionary more fit than atheists based on their rate of reproduction. Secular people are taking themselves out of the gene pool while preaching darwinism and eugenics and acting superior which is the best joke God could ever pull on them.
I assumed you were an atheist based on what you wrote because those are common atheist arguments.
Dude, talking about strawmen. Didn't you understand anything I wrote? Where did i say there are multiple true religions? I said there is a way to find out what religion is the true one and the whole stupid argument "but there are x number of them" is irrelevant. There could be a million claims out there and only one of them to be true.
I don't care about your psychological report. This is not an argument. I could easily turn that around and say that you don't believe because it makes you feel better and chill that once you die all lights are out so no consequences and nothing really matters in the long run. Btw do you believe the universe is ultimately meaningless? Do you consider that to be a rational belief?
Sure, are they not? This is your worldview after all. I see a lot of African immigrants swarming white countries the last few decades. The reason they do this (besides the political machinations of the international cabal) is because they have the numbers. Evolution is all about survival and reproduction. Lack of reproduction leads to extinction. How can a species thrive if it doesn't reproduce? Who cares about your superior genes if you touch wieners with other dudes, use contraception, abort your babies or fail to reproduce because Gill Bates told you the world is overpopulated (and actually you simply can't because you took his sterilizing shot)? And all this while white city dwelling cucks think they're smarter and more educated (i.e. indoctrinated) than peasant African chads having a hut full of children. It's a numbers game.