JD Vance and Trump are "petty tyrants" who terrorize anyone Netanyahu tells them to. Also, Trump just signed an executive order banning free speech if it is critical of racist terrorist jews.
In other words, JD Vance is projecting. He's the petty tyrant who lets Israel use USA's military like toilet paper. He's the anti-free-speech protector of anti-Christ racist terrorist jews.
a) Free will of choice implies ones only weapon, which either defends (perceivable) or offends (suggested)...communication lowers ones defense by taking what others offer.
b) Perception WAS before suggestion can shape what IS...
security conference
Con-ferre (carrying together) contradicts se-cura (free from care)...
If you are given cheaper gas as means to persuade you to support foreign wars, is that good?
Is there is a sincere action committed solely to the benefit of one people? No. Every thing in this era has ulterior motives. It is naïve to believe otherwise. You are here on this forum with faith in that.
Is there is a sincere action committed solely to the benefit of one people?
a) Action (inception towards death) solely to the benefit of each ones reaction (life)...
b) Committing by consent to suggested pluralism (people) corrupts ones sincerity.
Every thing in this era has ulterior motives
Everything moves each thing apart from one another...ulterior/ulter - "on the other side" implies one reaching out to another, while ignoring to be set apart from one another.
There's free will of choice in-between ulterior (suggested) and motive (perceivable)...the former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter moves through one.
JD Vance and Trump are "petty tyrants" who terrorize anyone Netanyahu tells them to. Also, Trump just signed an executive order banning free speech if it is critical of racist terrorist jews.
In other words, JD Vance is projecting. He's the petty tyrant who lets Israel use USA's military like toilet paper. He's the anti-free-speech protector of anti-Christ racist terrorist jews.
a) Free will of choice implies ones only weapon, which either defends (perceivable) or offends (suggested)...communication lowers ones defense by taking what others offer.
b) Perception WAS before suggestion can shape what IS...
Con-ferre (carrying together) contradicts se-cura (free from care)...
Munich/mönch/monk/monos - "solitary"...hence secure.
Edit: notice the logo... https://securityconference.org/en/press/in-the-media/full/six-months-to-go-munich-security-conference-2024/
So, nothing GOOD ever happens? Is that your world view?
Good is a metric.
If you are given cheaper gas as means to persuade you to support foreign wars, is that good?
Is there is a sincere action committed solely to the benefit of one people? No. Every thing in this era has ulterior motives. It is naïve to believe otherwise. You are here on this forum with faith in that.
a) Action (inception towards death) solely to the benefit of each ones reaction (life)...
b) Committing by consent to suggested pluralism (people) corrupts ones sincerity.
Everything moves each thing apart from one another...ulterior/ulter - "on the other side" implies one reaching out to another, while ignoring to be set apart from one another.
There's free will of choice in-between ulterior (suggested) and motive (perceivable)...the former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter moves through one.