Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

7
Fatal bad law: gone under the radar, now it bites you back. (prostasia.org)
posted 343 days ago by Mrexreturns 343 days ago by Mrexreturns +7 / -0
Criminalizing art and fiction is a bridge too far for the United Nations - Prostasia Foundation
We analyze submissions received by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child to its proposal to ban art and fiction depicting minors and sex.
prostasia.org
3 comments share
3 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (3)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– Mrexreturns [S] 2 points 343 days ago +2 / -0

I do not hear this being brought up anywhere even when I was in r/conspiracy, before it was taken over by the UN.

In February 2019 the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child released a draft set of Guidelines for the implementation of an existing international treaty on child protection called the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography. These Guidelines included a radical reinterpretation of the international legal definition of “child pornography,” that would expand it to include not only photographs and movies, but also “drawings and cartoons; audio representations; any digital media representation; live performances; written materials in print or online; and physical objects such as sculptures, toys, or ornaments.” In other words, criminalizing art and fiction.

This is not a child protection law. Listen. It is NOT a child protection law, this is to make sure you will be witch-hunted no matter where you go.

And witch-hunt they do.

While they cannot arrest you, the UN has a "gangster police" twitter mob made of paid shills and sockpuppets they use to enforce this.

And you expect that there are several legit weirdos that will believe in these lies.

Beware. One wrong step, you will be cancelled. You will roll over and die, and you will be happy.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– wtfppl 1 point 340 days ago +1 / -0

There is a redditor in Seattle that now wears an eye patch over his left eye for stocking me back in 2018 when I was very prolific on reddit r/con in pointing out pdfs working for the system(State). Seems they caught on to who I actually am and had people follow me. The one person who decided to intervene did so when I had my brothers child with me. BIG MISTAKE!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 343 days ago +1 / -0

criminalizing art and fiction

Crime/krei - "to separate" contradicts the establishment of fictitious artifice by ones consent to the suggestion of another. Hence...

United Nations

...uniting together that which reality sets apart.

bad law

Since the United Nations doesn't criminalize (separate) it instead is used to unite laws together by tricking the majority to give consent to suggested crimes.

Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) once again implies separation...not unification.

Prostasia

A contraindication in terms...pro (forwards) stasis (standing still).

to ban art

a) Ones consent to suggested artifice implies ones banishment of perceivable nature, hence willingly ignoring reality for fiction.

b) Ban/bannan - "to summon, command, proclaim" implies the suggestions of few summoning, commanding and proclaiming towards the consent of many.

c) Just like with disarming a population, while simultaneously selling weapons...few are banning art, while selling art (and even giving it away for free) to many.

to depict

The issue with dividing (de) a captured moment (picture) is the suggestion thereof towards others, hence sharing the artificial depiction within the natural order.

This ties into child abuse, hence sharing abuse with others or artificially using others to abuse self. Masturbation isn't a victimless crime, otherwise porn wouldn't be free.

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - ptjlq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy