I think people are too quick to assume someone in the media or alt media is a "shill" who is knowingly deceiving people. We have to ask ourselves, how many of these people are themselves brainwashed, hypnotized and/or MK Ultra tools?
For example, we see some of the strange behavior of Joe Rogan. We see how he worships Elon, how he brings on Alex Jones, yet also has access to so many random billionaires who are clearly establishment, and of course became such an overnight sensation. Maybe he is programmed to like Elon/Alex, and when the narrative shifts his programming is updated. That way he is not acting and his reactions appear to be genuine.
I think this is a real possibility to explain some of the inconsistencies with some media figures.
And how about Tucker Carlson? He's a man who went from being an establishment shill to a supposed anti-establishment maverick. But what's with his strange laugh? Is it some kind of dissociative defense mechanism? What about that odd semi-hypnotized facial expression he has when listening to people. And what about his recent alleged encounter with a demon where he had physical marks on himself? How much of this might be programming? That might explain why he is still alive after supposedly crossing the establishment.
We are all hypnotized and MK’d to a certain extent.
Trauma based mind control led Americans to inject poison and support retarded wars.
I didnt watch tv or movies for a month, only listening to instrumental music as an experiment.
I think I’m gonna keep it up. The revenge porn of action movies. The tavistock music. Constant flashes of tits and ass. Bandwagon adverts. It’s all designed to excite in such a way that harms your logic, wellbeing, sense of reality, selfesteem, etc etc
a) Being implies medium (perception) within origin (perceivable).
b) Coming into being implies alternation of origin into medium.
c) Ones consent to suggested media or alternative media tempts one to ignore self for others aka a self deception.
d) Shill implies "one who acts as a decoy for a gambler"...suggestion itself implies the decoy for ones gambling consent to gamble perception away through ignorance.
Opposite of shilling implies honesty aka to hone oneself by resisting the temptations by another.