Origin runs...asking for outcome tempts one to ignore being (life) run (inception towards death) by origin.
The questions one asks permit those who answer to build artificial operating systems within reality.
You've made an interesting connection
Nature separates each one within from one another during procession...making connections with one another tempts one to ignore self discernment, while binding self to others. Few utilize suggested information to spell-bound consenting many with connections into a world wide web.
through a philosophical lens
Notice the implication of an artificial lens (suggested information) over natural sight (perceivable inspiration)...
Notice furthermore that THEY LIVE made a spectacle out of getting others to put on the artificial lens to see the distorted reality...a spectacle representing a "fake" wresting match (reason) between white (discernment) and black (ignorance).
Philosophy is the study of metaphysics (being), epistemology (knowledge), ethics (morality) and logic. Who's LRH (L. Ron Hubbard?) and where is the conspiracy?
PHIL (tending to) LO (logic; conflict of reason) SOPHIA (knowledge)
Knowledge implies perceivable; logic implies reasoning over suggested, and tending to implies the temptation to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want).
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) implies origin moving through one, while tending implies towards outcome.
PHIL implies the suggested inversion of perceivable SOPHIA...LO(gic) implies the consequence of falling for suggested, while ignoring perceivable.
like what even is that
Same knowledge moving through each different mind aka even (inception towards death) generating odds (life) with the opportunity of being.
Few utilize suggestion to equalize differences (evening the odds) among many by tempting "alike" consent.
The suggested spell "phi-lo-sophy" tricks one to consent aka tend to (phi) suggested information, which lures one into a conflict of reason (lo) against others, while ignoring perceivable inspiration (sophy).
what is reality?
Ones response (re) to all (al). The issue...all WAS perceivable before one can suggest each other what IS. Ones consent to what another suggest IS implies fiction.
what is the nature of being?
ALL nurturing each ONE native being...nature/nurture/native/gnasci/gene - "to give birth, beget".
what can we know...
Nothing. Since knowledge implies all perceivable dividing into each ones perception. Suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore everything (all) for de-nial (nihilo; nothing) thereof.
Origin runs...asking for outcome tempts one to ignore being (life) run (inception towards death) by origin.
The questions one asks permit those who answer to build artificial operating systems within reality.
Nature separates each one within from one another during procession...making connections with one another tempts one to ignore self discernment, while binding self to others. Few utilize suggested information to spell-bound consenting many with connections into a world wide web.
Notice the implication of an artificial lens (suggested information) over natural sight (perceivable inspiration)...
Notice furthermore that THEY LIVE made a spectacle out of getting others to put on the artificial lens to see the distorted reality...a spectacle representing a "fake" wresting match (reason) between white (discernment) and black (ignorance).
Philosophy is the study of metaphysics (being), epistemology (knowledge), ethics (morality) and logic. Who's LRH (L. Ron Hubbard?) and where is the conspiracy?
As profound as philosophy can be, it can also be garbagey
(It matters what it's rooted in, this is funny to me on a few levels)
PHIL (tending to) LO (logic; conflict of reason) SOPHIA (knowledge)
Knowledge implies perceivable; logic implies reasoning over suggested, and tending to implies the temptation to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want).
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) implies origin moving through one, while tending implies towards outcome.
PHIL implies the suggested inversion of perceivable SOPHIA...LO(gic) implies the consequence of falling for suggested, while ignoring perceivable.
Same knowledge moving through each different mind aka even (inception towards death) generating odds (life) with the opportunity of being.
Few utilize suggestion to equalize differences (evening the odds) among many by tempting "alike" consent.
The suggested spell "phi-lo-sophy" tricks one to consent aka tend to (phi) suggested information, which lures one into a conflict of reason (lo) against others, while ignoring perceivable inspiration (sophy).
Ones response (re) to all (al). The issue...all WAS perceivable before one can suggest each other what IS. Ones consent to what another suggest IS implies fiction.
ALL nurturing each ONE native being...nature/nurture/native/gnasci/gene - "to give birth, beget".
Nothing. Since knowledge implies all perceivable dividing into each ones perception. Suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore everything (all) for de-nial (nihilo; nothing) thereof.