a) A master reduces a slave to subjugation...being given FREE will of choice liberates one from subjugation.
b) "I" implies ones choice to take possession of self, which subjugates ones potential to express self freely. "I" also establishes "YOU" (phonetic jew)...
I am tuned to the Lord's frequency,
a) Frequent implies "repetition of action" aka ones reactions (Christ) within all action (God).
b) Inception towards death implies wavelength of frequency; while life implies amplitude of frequency....only as amplitude (growth) within wavelength (loss) can there be a tone/tonos/ten - "to stretch" aka a raising of voice.
a) To own implies taking into possession, hence choosing to hold onto. FREE will of choice implies wielding a potential given by balance.
b) Both possession (own) and subjugation (under) contradict FREE, and despite taking possession or subjugating self...one remains free to choose to let go and liberate self.
God's guidance
Motion (inception towards death) inspires matter (life) to resist...the temptation to ignore resisting by following along is what others suggest as "guidance", which is why many constantly seek guidance from few.
If God implies one, then there's one way (inception towards death) for each one being (life) within...how does one need a guide for a one way direction back to origin?
he protects me
Protection aka pro (forward) tegere (to cover) tion (action)...action forwards reactions by setting free aka by revealing being.
It's ones free will of choice consenting to suggested protection which covers ones perception from all perceivable revealed to one.
I know the worth of my soul now
a) To know implies to perceive; my implies to take possession of...how could one take possession of what one perceives if all perceivable moves?
b) If soul/sole - "one and only", then why claim possession as MY over YOURS?
Doesn't soul/sole - "one and only" imply God? Why then establish a MY vs YOURS conflict by claiming possession over the one and only soul/sole?
me, Hebrew
He-brew implies "for others", me implies "for self"...a contradiction.
What if the wavelength never ends?
a) Beginning and end implies inception and death of amplitude (life). Wavelength doesn't have a beginning or end unless the amplitude within shapes points of measurement.
Notice that while alive, one cannot perceive ones inception or death...yet life constantly measures in-between beginnings and ends, while ignoring that.
b) Never (nothing ever) implies suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of EVER-ything perceivable.
Once again it was your free will of choice to hold onto "never" as a suggested point of measurement, while ignoring that all perceivable moves.
Exponential growth
Wavelength implies loss (inception towards death); amplitude implies growth (life) aka temporal growth within ongoing loss.
Exponent implies "put forth"...that which puts forth growth (living) implies loss (dying).
unimaginable, I imagine
Image/imitari - "to copy" aka to copy (consenting to suggested) original (perceiving perceivable).
An image aka a picture implies a captured moment tempting ones mind/memory to hold onto it, while ignoring the ongoing momentum (inception towards death) moving through ones (life) sight.
We've been here before, I am tuned to the Lord's frequency, thanks Jesus!!!
I am a slave and I serve the greatest Master.
a) A master reduces a slave to subjugation...being given FREE will of choice liberates one from subjugation.
b) "I" implies ones choice to take possession of self, which subjugates ones potential to express self freely. "I" also establishes "YOU" (phonetic jew)...
a) Frequent implies "repetition of action" aka ones reactions (Christ) within all action (God).
b) Inception towards death implies wavelength of frequency; while life implies amplitude of frequency....only as amplitude (growth) within wavelength (loss) can there be a tone/tonos/ten - "to stretch" aka a raising of voice.
I, of my own free will choose life under God's guidance, He protects me and I know the worth of my soul now.
What if the wavelength never ends? Exponential growth, unimaginable, I imagine.
a) To own implies taking into possession, hence choosing to hold onto. FREE will of choice implies wielding a potential given by balance.
b) Both possession (own) and subjugation (under) contradict FREE, and despite taking possession or subjugating self...one remains free to choose to let go and liberate self.
Motion (inception towards death) inspires matter (life) to resist...the temptation to ignore resisting by following along is what others suggest as "guidance", which is why many constantly seek guidance from few.
If God implies one, then there's one way (inception towards death) for each one being (life) within...how does one need a guide for a one way direction back to origin?
Protection aka pro (forward) tegere (to cover) tion (action)...action forwards reactions by setting free aka by revealing being.
It's ones free will of choice consenting to suggested protection which covers ones perception from all perceivable revealed to one.
a) To know implies to perceive; my implies to take possession of...how could one take possession of what one perceives if all perceivable moves?
b) If soul/sole - "one and only", then why claim possession as MY over YOURS?
Doesn't soul/sole - "one and only" imply God? Why then establish a MY vs YOURS conflict by claiming possession over the one and only soul/sole?
He-brew implies "for others", me implies "for self"...a contradiction.
a) Beginning and end implies inception and death of amplitude (life). Wavelength doesn't have a beginning or end unless the amplitude within shapes points of measurement.
Notice that while alive, one cannot perceive ones inception or death...yet life constantly measures in-between beginnings and ends, while ignoring that.
b) Never (nothing ever) implies suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of EVER-ything perceivable.
Once again it was your free will of choice to hold onto "never" as a suggested point of measurement, while ignoring that all perceivable moves.
Wavelength implies loss (inception towards death); amplitude implies growth (life) aka temporal growth within ongoing loss.
Exponent implies "put forth"...that which puts forth growth (living) implies loss (dying).
Image/imitari - "to copy" aka to copy (consenting to suggested) original (perceiving perceivable).
An image aka a picture implies a captured moment tempting ones mind/memory to hold onto it, while ignoring the ongoing momentum (inception towards death) moving through ones (life) sight.