What's lacking is a correct understanding of what has come to be called the "NPC". Everyone now seems to equate it with something like "stupid and brainwashed" or "soulless" or whatever vague notion they subconsciously decide to accept.
No one really bothers to study it. In the present article, the vital point really is to show "how right he was all along", not to investigate and theorize as to the nature of the phenomenon.
The "NPC" phenomenon is but one informal name for a particular state or level of human consciousness, described many times by many names as far back as the Gnostics and the Book of Ecclesiastes. My educated guess is that about 80% of the population are NPCs.
Functionally, NPCs receive their Reality from those they have accepted as "authorities". Parents, teachers, priests, politicians, intellectuals, Rachel Maddow, whoever. This "Reality" is strong enough to overcome all evidence and argumentation.
So what we have with Leftists is that they are crazy because they are NPCs and they have been told crazy things. If you've ever argued with them, it's pointless and now you see precisely why. Are you on "The View"? No.
There are similarly NPCs on the Right, but they have been told far fewer crazy things lately. That's precisely the reason why there appears to be a "Woke Right". Lacking bad input, even NPCs do a pretty good job of figuring out what's going on.
The anomalous evidence, which this theory handily explains, is that there are certain areas where people on the Woke Right still believe crazy things. Shining example is Christian Zionism. Where would they get the insane idea that we all have to support Israel? Not by research and reasoning, but in church, where the authority stands right up front and does all the talking.
Another piece of anomalous evidence is Bill Maher. He mostly says batshit Leftist crap but he also says many things that make complete sense. Why? He's not an NPC, but the next level up. He came to absorb the Leftists patterns around him, but his elevated consciousness struggles--sometimes winning, sometimes losing--with matching up the Reality given by authority with that which he sees around him.
Nature doesn't lack anything...it's the ongoing loss for each temporary growth within.
Everyone now seems to equate it with something like
ONE implies different from one another...equating alike tempts one to ignore that.
vague notion
Holding onto an "alike equation" makes notion of motion seem vague.
the nature of the phenomenon
Noumenon (perceivable) implies nature of phenomenon (perception).
informal name for a particular state
Any suggested "informal name" tempts common consent, which contradicts particular state.
particular state of consciousness
If it's particular (apart), then why call it CON (together) SCIOUS (to perceive)?
many times by many names
Same motion for each different matter timed or named...
receive their Reality from those they have accepted as "authorities"
Reality (perceivable) moves through one, fiction (suggested) tempts one to hold onto it. Consenting to a suggestion implies accepting another as the author of the suggested.
This "Reality" is strong enough
Ones consent to hold onto suggested fiction by FREE will of choice is strong enough to distract one from perceivable reality.
If you've ever argued with them (leftists)...
Left-ist implies ones consent to suggested left-ism, which establishes a conflict of reason (left vs right) aka an argument.
figuring out
Matter (life) implies figure within motion (inception towards death).
the reason why there appears to be a "Woke Right"
Because reasoning against each other about woke right vs woke left binds both sides to the same conflict of mutual destruction.
Choosing a side (as choice within balance) tethers one to the opposition (choice vs choice imbalance).
in church, where the authority stands right up front
Authority to others is given by ones consent to suggested religion/religo - "to bind anew".
Church/circe/keue - "to swell; grow in bulk" contradicts nature, which generates growth in parts, hence each ones growth within all of nature.
Going into church implies "en-trance" aka putting self into trance - "crossing of a sea; coma; passage from life to death; fear of coming evil; a passage away or apart"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/trance#etymonline_v_16869
He mostly says batshit Leftist crap but he also says many things that make complete sense. Why?
Left VERSUS right implies a conflict at center...supplied by both sides with willing contestants entering the ring.
sometimes winning, sometimes losing
If you like to gamble, I tell you I'm your man
You win some, lose some, it's all the same to me
There's no winning or losing within a ring, only mutual destruction, where those who loose less are declared winner by those outside the ring.
This ring within self is called LOGIC and against others is called REASON...entrance by consent to suggested implies gambling, while sharing suggested implies LOGOS aka words (fiction) shaped within sound (reality).
What's lacking is a correct understanding of what has come to be called the "NPC". Everyone now seems to equate it with something like "stupid and brainwashed" or "soulless" or whatever vague notion they subconsciously decide to accept.
No one really bothers to study it. In the present article, the vital point really is to show "how right he was all along", not to investigate and theorize as to the nature of the phenomenon.
The "NPC" phenomenon is but one informal name for a particular state or level of human consciousness, described many times by many names as far back as the Gnostics and the Book of Ecclesiastes. My educated guess is that about 80% of the population are NPCs.
Functionally, NPCs receive their Reality from those they have accepted as "authorities". Parents, teachers, priests, politicians, intellectuals, Rachel Maddow, whoever. This "Reality" is strong enough to overcome all evidence and argumentation.
So what we have with Leftists is that they are crazy because they are NPCs and they have been told crazy things. If you've ever argued with them, it's pointless and now you see precisely why. Are you on "The View"? No.
There are similarly NPCs on the Right, but they have been told far fewer crazy things lately. That's precisely the reason why there appears to be a "Woke Right". Lacking bad input, even NPCs do a pretty good job of figuring out what's going on.
The anomalous evidence, which this theory handily explains, is that there are certain areas where people on the Woke Right still believe crazy things. Shining example is Christian Zionism. Where would they get the insane idea that we all have to support Israel? Not by research and reasoning, but in church, where the authority stands right up front and does all the talking.
Another piece of anomalous evidence is Bill Maher. He mostly says batshit Leftist crap but he also says many things that make complete sense. Why? He's not an NPC, but the next level up. He came to absorb the Leftists patterns around him, but his elevated consciousness struggles--sometimes winning, sometimes losing--with matching up the Reality given by authority with that which he sees around him.
Haha, long rant! I should write a book.
Nature doesn't lack anything...it's the ongoing loss for each temporary growth within.
ONE implies different from one another...equating alike tempts one to ignore that.
Holding onto an "alike equation" makes notion of motion seem vague.
Noumenon (perceivable) implies nature of phenomenon (perception).
Any suggested "informal name" tempts common consent, which contradicts particular state.
If it's particular (apart), then why call it CON (together) SCIOUS (to perceive)?
Same motion for each different matter timed or named...
Reality (perceivable) moves through one, fiction (suggested) tempts one to hold onto it. Consenting to a suggestion implies accepting another as the author of the suggested.
Ones consent to hold onto suggested fiction by FREE will of choice is strong enough to distract one from perceivable reality.
Left-ist implies ones consent to suggested left-ism, which establishes a conflict of reason (left vs right) aka an argument.
Matter (life) implies figure within motion (inception towards death).
Because reasoning against each other about woke right vs woke left binds both sides to the same conflict of mutual destruction.
Choosing a side (as choice within balance) tethers one to the opposition (choice vs choice imbalance).
Authority to others is given by ones consent to suggested religion/religo - "to bind anew".
Church/circe/keue - "to swell; grow in bulk" contradicts nature, which generates growth in parts, hence each ones growth within all of nature.
Going into church implies "en-trance" aka putting self into trance - "crossing of a sea; coma; passage from life to death; fear of coming evil; a passage away or apart"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/trance#etymonline_v_16869
Left VERSUS right implies a conflict at center...supplied by both sides with willing contestants entering the ring.
There's no winning or losing within a ring, only mutual destruction, where those who loose less are declared winner by those outside the ring.
This ring within self is called LOGIC and against others is called REASON...entrance by consent to suggested implies gambling, while sharing suggested implies LOGOS aka words (fiction) shaped within sound (reality).