Nature doesn't lack anything...it's the ongoing loss for each temporary growth within.
Everyone now seems to equate it with something like
ONE implies different from one another...equating alike tempts one to ignore that.
vague notion
Holding onto an "alike equation" makes notion of motion seem vague.
the nature of the phenomenon
Noumenon (perceivable) implies nature of phenomenon (perception).
informal name for a particular state
Any suggested "informal name" tempts common consent, which contradicts particular state.
particular state of consciousness
If it's particular (apart), then why call it CON (together) SCIOUS (to perceive)?
many times by many names
Same motion for each different matter timed or named...
receive their Reality from those they have accepted as "authorities"
Reality (perceivable) moves through one, fiction (suggested) tempts one to hold onto it. Consenting to a suggestion implies accepting another as the author of the suggested.
This "Reality" is strong enough
Ones consent to hold onto suggested fiction by FREE will of choice is strong enough to distract one from perceivable reality.
If you've ever argued with them (leftists)...
Left-ist implies ones consent to suggested left-ism, which establishes a conflict of reason (left vs right) aka an argument.
figuring out
Matter (life) implies figure within motion (inception towards death).
the reason why there appears to be a "Woke Right"
Because reasoning against each other about woke right vs woke left binds both sides to the same conflict of mutual destruction.
Choosing a side (as choice within balance) tethers one to the opposition (choice vs choice imbalance).
in church, where the authority stands right up front
Authority to others is given by ones consent to suggested religion/religo - "to bind anew".
Church/circe/keue - "to swell; grow in bulk" contradicts nature, which generates growth in parts, hence each ones growth within all of nature.
Going into church implies "en-trance" aka putting self into trance - "crossing of a sea; coma; passage from life to death; fear of coming evil; a passage away or apart"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/trance#etymonline_v_16869
He mostly says batshit Leftist crap but he also says many things that make complete sense. Why?
Left VERSUS right implies a conflict at center...supplied by both sides with willing contestants entering the ring.
sometimes winning, sometimes losing
If you like to gamble, I tell you I'm your man
You win some, lose some, it's all the same to me
There's no winning or losing within a ring, only mutual destruction, where those who loose less are declared winner by those outside the ring.
This ring within self is called LOGIC and against others is called REASON...entrance by consent to suggested implies gambling, while sharing suggested implies LOGOS aka words (fiction) shaped within sound (reality).
Nature doesn't lack anything...it's the ongoing loss for each temporary growth within.
ONE implies different from one another...equating alike tempts one to ignore that.
Holding onto an "alike equation" makes notion of motion seem vague.
Noumenon (perceivable) implies nature of phenomenon (perception).
Any suggested "informal name" tempts common consent, which contradicts particular state.
If it's particular (apart), then why call it CON (together) SCIOUS (to perceive)?
Same motion for each different matter timed or named...
Reality (perceivable) moves through one, fiction (suggested) tempts one to hold onto it. Consenting to a suggestion implies accepting another as the author of the suggested.
Ones consent to hold onto suggested fiction by FREE will of choice is strong enough to distract one from perceivable reality.
Left-ist implies ones consent to suggested left-ism, which establishes a conflict of reason (left vs right) aka an argument.
Matter (life) implies figure within motion (inception towards death).
Because reasoning against each other about woke right vs woke left binds both sides to the same conflict of mutual destruction.
Choosing a side (as choice within balance) tethers one to the opposition (choice vs choice imbalance).
Authority to others is given by ones consent to suggested religion/religo - "to bind anew".
Church/circe/keue - "to swell; grow in bulk" contradicts nature, which generates growth in parts, hence each ones growth within all of nature.
Going into church implies "en-trance" aka putting self into trance - "crossing of a sea; coma; passage from life to death; fear of coming evil; a passage away or apart"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/trance#etymonline_v_16869
Left VERSUS right implies a conflict at center...supplied by both sides with willing contestants entering the ring.
There's no winning or losing within a ring, only mutual destruction, where those who loose less are declared winner by those outside the ring.
This ring within self is called LOGIC and against others is called REASON...entrance by consent to suggested implies gambling, while sharing suggested implies LOGOS aka words (fiction) shaped within sound (reality).