Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

2
Flat smacking bitches (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by Dps1879 1 year ago by Dps1879 +6 / -5
41 comments share
41 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (41)
sorted by:
▲ 7 ▼
– TallestSkil 7 points 1 year ago +9 / -2

Reminder that you and the rest of your paid jewish shill friends have not–and cannot–answer a single one of these questions.

  • Why can everyone south of the equator see the exact same stars rotating in the same direction around the same fixed central point in the sky due south of them if they’re supposedly all looking in different directions?
  • Why are the distances between degrees of latitude uniform and don’t grow exponentially away from the equator?
  • Why does everyone on Earth get the same result for the Eratosthenes experiment, when people nearer the equator should get a much smaller circumference for the Earth than those nearer the poles?
  • Come to think of it, was Eratosthenes part of the “round Earth” conspiracy?
  • Surviving records show that the ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians based their astronomical forecasts on calculations assuming the Earth is a globe. Did this conspiracy begin at the dawn of civilization, or are all ancient artifacts nothing but Victorian forgeries? If so, why has this never been detected by modern carbon-dating techniques?
  • Why do arc lengths of given angles of longitude decrease rather than increase south of the equator?
  • Why does the sun not rise in the northeast and set in the northwest, year round, for everyone on Earth?
  • Why DOES the sun set, when the law of perspective states that the angular size of the sun’s altitude, like everything else, can’t become negative?
  • Why does the sun’s angular size not change throughout the day or year, since it is “moving toward and away from us” and is “closer than we’re told”?
  • Seriously, did you fall asleep during geometry class, or are you just completely demented?
  • If you believe in zeteticism, why do you keep relying on magical and unprovable solutions, which can’t be shown to exist with your own eyes and clearly don’t exist at all? Apparently, zeteticism is just code for “make any old bullshit up and pretend it’s true.”
  • If all photographs of a round Earth are a hoax, why not simply create photographs of a flat Earth?
  • A property of mass is that it has gravitational force regardless of size. If the Earth did not have a gravitational field, wouldn’t that imply that the Earth doesn’t physically exist?
  • Where is the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station located if the south “pole” is the whole circumference of the Earth?
  • Wouldn’t creating such elaborate fakes and conspiracies cost an equal–if not greater–amount of money than the science they are supposedly covering up?
  • The idea of the Earth as a sphere has existed at least since the time of the ancient Greeks, long before NASA. What were their financial motives?
  • What financial motives could NASA have, since their budget is still cut every year?
  • How could the sun be a spotlight if it is a sphere? On the flat Earth, the light projection would have to be a semicircle.
  • Why does the North Star goes to the horizon?
  • Why do constellations appear to be different in the Southern and Northern hemispheres?
  • Why is the Coriolis effect stronger near both poles, instead of stronger in the north and weaker in the south?
  • If the circumferential south pole is preventing the oceans from pouring over the edge of the flat Earth, why didn’t the oceans disappear during the incredible amount of time it would have taken for that ice to form?
  • If the oceans would–if they could–pour off the edge of the flat Earth, where, then, would they go? Does this mean that whatever keeps the oceans on the surface of the flat Earth only operates in a downward direction on the uppermost surface and is absent on the underneath?
  • Why are satellites visible from Earth with a pair of binoculars and even the naked eye?
  • How could a flat body maintain an atmosphere?
  • Why are other celestial bodies spheres but the Earth is not? How, and why, was the Earth created differently?

Die, kike.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 1 point 1 year ago +3 / -2

Are you ever going to come out of your imagination box? You're like fucking SpongeBob and Patrick playing in their cardboard box. It's cute for about 2 or 3 minutes but after that one can't really deny the extreme bullshit. Aren't you even a little embarrassed??

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TallestSkil 3 points 1 year ago +5 / -2

Are you ever going to come out of your imagination box?

Literally my line.

You're like fucking SpongeBob and Patrick

I shouldn’t be surprised that it’s now 1990s jewish media references that are the baseline for allegorical representation, but here we are.

playing in their cardboard box.

Don’t you mean cardboard sphere?

It's cute for about 2 or 3 minutes but after that one can't really deny the extreme bullshit.

Irony.

Aren’t you even a little embarrassed??

Said the paid jewish shill who refuses to answer a single question about his claimed ideological beliefs.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] -1 points 1 year ago +2 / -3

Stupid ass broken bot. Time for an upgrade. Stop resisting

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TallestSkil 3 points 1 year ago +4 / -1

you’re a bot because I am incapable of parsing questions about my own claimed beliefs and answering them within the context of the discussion

ChatGPT does better than you, kike.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 0 points 1 year ago +2 / -2

Why are you so gay?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TallestSkil 3 points 1 year ago +4 / -1

Why can’t you answer the questions, yid?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] -2 points 1 year ago +1 / -3

I don't read anything your trash ass writes. Can't answer questions without reading. If you're really that curious for answers you can make a new account that isn't such a caricature of a penis and I'll probably be tricked into answering if you have a better attitude when asking.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ -6 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] -6 points 1 year ago +1 / -7

There's muh bitch.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TallestSkil 3 points 1 year ago +5 / -2

does exactly what I said

Dance for me, you fucking yid puppet.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– SwampRangers 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

So globesmacking is a thing when I talk about menisci? I'm globesmacked!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 1 point 1 year ago +2 / -1

Menisci is a lens that is convex on one side and concave on the other. If you want to relate it to water you have to be more specific. Also you're taking about an effect of water tension which has conditions. The shape of the earth has already been proven and is online for those who actually care. As the Christ is found in between Lucifer and Satan so it's all truth found in the same fashion. If your masters let us talk about flat and round then surely it is in between the two. A rounded tetrahedron fits the bill exactly. What creator would make a pancake earth or a sphere? The earth is special. Also please at least show your moderator smart. You shouldn't make mistakes like, the earth is round because "some other observations". that's like commoncore kids saying the earth is round because sun and moon are round. That's ridiculous logic.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SwampRangers 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Water menisci are water surfaces that can be either concave or convex. My context was sufficient.

the Christ is found in between Lucifer and Satan

your masters

Doesn't sound like Christian "flat earthe" to me. He is my one master.

A rounded tetrahedron fits the bill exactly .... The earth is special.

Like in Inception? I like it! It accords with the cube in the heavens, Rev. 21-22, and I'm no fan of oblate spheroids when I have an alternative. Some gravity and curvature math is needed, of course, and ordinary measurement should answer those. I'll need to go dig out the guy who found the four corners (vertices) of the tetrahedron.

But I don't think I was mistaken, you can call me out specifically if necessary.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Man can only serve one master. In the future things will not be so full of freedom of choice.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

https://i.postimg.cc/50nR4c74/19240918p01-03s.gif

https://i.postimg.cc/brZ3qZSg/19240918p01-04s.gif

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

The truth is out there

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SwampRangers 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

That's a very nice projection, one of my favorites. But that was devised to put the map border entirely in the ocean (like Buckminster-Fuller), whereas I'm told the firmament entirely touches the land and not the ocean (not sure if that's Enoch or otherwise). Do you think we should take the four corners of the land and fix this projection? The border would still fall partly in the ocean, though. Not sure if that solves the problem that the Antarctica ice wall was intended to solve.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I heard a quote from the prize winner. He took all known information and tetrahedron was only only shape it would fit on. He didn't pick it!!! The data did!!!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Rounded Tetrahedron is also one of the few shapes that besides being spiritually verified also has 4 corners(inside corners)to be verified by ancient texts. You can literally get the shapes yourself with cardboard and see where you have to bend(rounded) them together to join them. 4 pieces from 4 corners of the universe put together by hand. Further verified as tetrahedron by following the so called "ring" of fire lines which show where the 4 pieces are connected together.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SwampRangers 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Nice. I think you mean the Mid-Ocean Ridge (MOR) rather than the Ring of Fire, because the ridge does match the tetrahedral coordinates you gave.

Well, looking at how various asteroids and plutoids have similar seams according to the PTB (powerz that be), I would have no problem with theorizing that the earth came together from four plasma formations of relatively equal size that then led to dry land appearing in a more tetrahedral formation than ordinarily assumed (the ICR has also been working on alternatives to Pangaea). If you cut the two opposite surfaces of a baseball each in half, the cuts plus the stitch lines make a very similar pattern to the MOR. This also simplies tectonic theory.

For the record, you have peak "corners" at South Pole, Japan, the Caucasus, and Central America. That could be Mt. Vinson, Mt. Fuji, Mt. Ararat, and (adjusted) Mt. Whitney. That's not a perfect tetrahedron at all but perfection would not be assumed either in the original or in the drifted state; and other mountains might be supplied as better information warrants.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_Fire

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

The land we stand on is not earth. The"crust" was added later. Also land moves up and down not around. England has risen and fallen 4x or so, so far.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 0 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

Lol you just proved my point by saying "water" menisci unlike your first attempt.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 0 points 1 year ago +2 / -2

Yes when you talk about something you haven't personally observed/experienced that would be the correct usage.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– SwampRangers 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

The irony seems lost on you. Menisci are curved water (convex or concave) that I've observed and anyone can observe. Globesmacking would mean silencing flat earthers. Gobsmacking (already exists) means silencing anyone. Flat earthers shouldn't be arguing flat water, it's too easy of a fail for them.

My alt, u/SwampRangersAlt, really is a flat earther. So, since your most immediate contribs don't make your position clear without reference to convoluted links, I'd certainly be interested in what you think or have observed or have concluded. We didn't ban flat earthers here yet, did we?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Thisisnotanexit 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

No ban, we lost the vote and got accused of censorship.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] -1 points 1 year ago +2 / -3

Who's we?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SwampRangers 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

c/Conspiracies. If there's no topic ban "we" have no need to pussyfoot.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SmithW1984 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

The Earth could be spherical and still not rotate through space. This is not the same argument.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Dps1879 [S] 0 points 1 year ago +2 / -2

K

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Axias 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Jew shill, calling the earth flat, and anyone who does not agree with him: also a jew shill.

-Flat earth BS is banned from conspiracies I thought? Didn't we collectively agree to respect geometry together?

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy