Out of all the conspiracy forums:
-
Reddit allows you to gain more opinions, even tho 30-40% of them will be against you, and promoting propaganda. [Mods might shadow-ban your comments.]
-
9GAG allows free speech. Which is taking into account that many shills will insult your mother in the comments, but still - you can expand a topic with someone. [Mods won't ban you, unless you're openly racist and toxic.]
-
Saidit expands on the topics, but too young of a forum. Some are worth the time, others are too scared to speak out... [Pretty good mods, I really like this place.]
-
c/conspiracy - filled with shills, who will block any communication with insults, useless etymology, or useless comments... No useful discussion - 0. [The mod is useless.]
Every other conspiracy forum provides a discussion on your topic.
Here, it's only progressed, if the comments are for this topic. That's egotistical behavior of people, who can't allow anything else but their own opinion.
Examples:
-
I exposed TallestSkil and made him create a new account (he's still insulting users with it, but at least I made him create several posts, after exposing that he never posted for 3 years).
-
I exposed free-will-of-choice of being a bot, now he provides more than basic etymology in his comments.
-
I continued to expose others, and the mod created a rule to "never expose anyone in here"... Suspicious? Not if you know about his "Big Foot" post, where I just exposed it as a lie and he muted me for 3 days... Oh... justice... or is freedom of speech.. Can't tell..
Have you done something to change something else? Ever?
Because you can't do it in here. Certainly, you won't be welcomed to do it in here.
If you have proofs, and examples, that counter a post, for example how this "TurnToGodNow" user promoted a post that plainly said "No graphene oxide in vaccines, guys... I found a reddit comment with 5 upvotes that disproved it, please look the other way"... And when I exposed him, he simply blocked me... Because that's how arrogant people react to a rebutal, while hiding behind the "God" slogan...
There's no real discussion in here. No progress.
Just arrogant people enjoying their upvotes, while gaining no knowledge on any topic.
Would you prefer to stay with the arrogant? Or perhaps the progressive?
That choice I leave to you. Just thought it would be worth for some of you to check other places and how they function. Because this place can only work in one way - disfunction.
Bottom line, either you think you're a perfect human being, only working for upvotes, and never for progress...
Or you want to help someone, which will never happen here if you're pointing out a flaw in their posts... You can only be a cheerleader in here to gain popularity... Or a shill that never gets removed from the ineffective mod, even when exposed in many posts...
There is no progress in here.
I've been in here from the creation of this place. It never progressed.
You only get popularity if people agree with the general topic - that means the title. They don't even care about the content of your post...
If you want popularity for doing close to nothing - stay here, if you want progress, join me in the other conspiracy forums (there may be others that I haven't listed).
If you want to work for the truth, or others - work for them!
If you want to work only for yourself - we're not the same!
To all the shills in here that I've exposed - enjoy your upvotes. That's the best you can ever do!
But there might be someone in here, who is willing to work for more than their ego. And they will change the world, whether you like it or not.
If you want to be stagnant, decadent, complacent - stay here. You deserve it!
But if you want progress, change, better future - You better fight for it! You deserve it!
Well, there's the dampening factor that all the conspiracy theories are coming true at unheard-of pace.
I often invert OP's like this by going meta and showing absurdity by being absurd. But I suspect that if I just criticized your post for spelling errors and personal attack and no forward momentum the irony would be lost on many.
What's "progress" here? Because I've been busy changing the world for a long time, plus four years here, and defining progress the way Jesus does I see plenty of it.
To me, making people grapple with your data and leaving them with it is an excellent return on investment. If a person changes his mind over time, even better, but it's not my responsibility or power to change minds. People agreeing and building a case is also a good return, but adversity makes a case shine even better.
So I'm unclear on how the OP makes "progress". Thanks.
Jesus saw jews in the temple exchanging coins like it was the damn forex currency exchange. Jesus became angry, cursed them and flipped their tables. The kikes ran to the authorities and beared false witness in court and demanded the crucifixion of Jesus Christ even when Pontius pilate offered up a serial killer instead. Barrabas.
Now we know Jesus was capable of anger, and what might be described as violent behavior by a modern safe space faggot.
But here is the conspiracy. Did Jesus Christ laugh? Did he have a sense of humor? Did He and the disciples crack jokes? Or was Jesus always serious?
Most of Jesus's parables have one or more punchlines. Their humor is lost on us partly due to context and partly due to repetition. The parable of the virgins is a standard blond joke. See also Ps. 2:4.
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/199hlNRwDn/here-is-a-podcast-episode-where-/c/4ZGTIAbVxPc
Sorry, are you too busy "changing the world"? Let me quote you:
So, how did you do this miracle? Care to give us an example, oh wise one. Or should I say, thou hypocrite?
I'll wait for your reply.
So, after an OP which is ostensibly about how c/Conspiracies has "only progressed, if the comments are for this topic", you derail your own topic; and after several people accuse you of going after individuals randomly, you go after me randomly? The self-awareness is off the charts.
Jesus and I have been changing the world since it was founded (though I joined the game in the 80s). For one example, as described at SwampRangers.com and the Swamp Fox, Scott Lively, we appointed Swamp Rangers around the country to drain the swamp of impolitic creatures, since 2021-01-01. Official Swamp Ranger #1 has done a bang-up job, his name is D. John Trump.
Am I just dropping names or does my snark indicate I really do have an apprenticeship to omnipotence? Over the wires you can't tell!
That's all to say I asked you what "progress" is and you made no progress toward answering. The nonironic was, as I prophesied, lost on you, so now I'm laying it on extra thick. I couldn't remember why I thought we had something going on before, so I looked it up. Yeah, you posted Ted Pike and Steven Anderson to c/Christianity 2 months ago, I gave reasonable criticism for and against their positions, and then you bailed on us suddenly and started c/TrueChristianity all by yourself, made about 240 posts and got 5 comments total engagement, three of which you deleted. No wonder I could never tell what you were
onabout.So let's say one way I change the world is keeping Christians safe from you?
TLDR: You imply you want some power to "expand a topic with someone" who is not already "for this topic". That is, you want the superpower of changing a person's mind against his will. Since God is the source of this power (and I've been using it on people judiciously ever since he used it on me to convince me of himself against my fallen will), I suggest you take it up with him directly if you don't want to go through the likes of me as mediator. Because you sure ain't figuring out how to "expand" on your own! Snark for the snark.
Can you give one example of that arrogant statement?
Just one would be enough.
How is the world changed because of you?
I'll wait.