When Saddam was captured, US made sure he was portrayed in a sorry state hiding in a hole and then executed in a humiliating way. When Gaddafi was killed it was made sure it was done in humiliating way while supposedly fleeing. When the Americans killed Hasan Nasrallah it was made sure that it will be posed that he was hiding underground.
BUT when Jews killed Yahya Sinwar it was posed in a way to glorify him as a great fighter! Fighting to the last breath!
Jews have even over done it with this one. Every now and then they keep releasing a small piece of info to glorify Sinwar. Just recently they released that he hasn't eaten for 3 days before his death! Did Jews really need to release that? And does anyone believe that Jewish militias could leak footage by mistake? Is that even him?
Regardless, how Sinwar died. Jews could have portrayed his death how they wanted. But they picked to glorify his death as a hero among Muslim populations but WHY?
Are Jews preparing for a new Arab spring type revolutions where Islamists take over Egypt, Jordan and perhaps even Saudi Arabia? Basically back stabbing their own current vassals. Any conclusions why they would do this?
a) Yahya implies "alive", hence the war (reason) on sin (consent) continuing.
b) Conclusion (outcome) inverts implication (origin)...
c) Suggested glory implies "fame" and a jew attaches it to progressivism to tempt gentiles (life) to follow the way (inception towards death), hence destroying self through fame/fames/famine - "starvation".
Those hungry for fame are starving themselves to death...
d) Perceivable glory/gnoria - "knowledge"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/glory implies ones perception within all perceivable aka ones response to origin, hence resisting hunger instead of seeking star-vation. Knowledge fills the one who draws from it.