Anti-vaxx Redditor debunks graphene disinfo
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (73)
sorted by:
So the "it" you're referring to is the Raman spectrum? Is that correct?
Then your argument is saying you're certain the spectrum was for graphene and not sugar? Please elaborate to back up that argument, if it is in fact what you're trying to say. You haven't made any clear scientific argument.
You're just being vague.
See? You only deflect.
Playing dumb is a classical shill scenario... You're an embarrassment.
Your post is saying:
Typical propagandist tactic:
https://conspiracies.win/p/17tegZSGDy/friendly-reminder-on-how-to-spot/c/
"Play dumb" - Who knew you never needed any training for that one... Sugar-boy.
You're scientifically illiterate and can't form a coherent argument.
I asked a legitimate question to ascertain what the fuck you are even trying to argue. You are truly a moron with a giant ego and no background in these sciences.
You don't understand the "it" that he was referring to, so your "it" is different. You think he said the entire vaccine is sugar. Therefore you're a fucking idiot.