Anti-vaxx Redditor debunks graphene disinfo
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (73)
sorted by:
Redditors always do that...
Confusing sugar with nanotechnology is totally something OP would promote.
If you have information refuting the arguments against graphene presented by this spectroscopist please present them https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/fifth-column-promoting-graphene-fantasies
Vague attacks on what "OP would promote" just makes you look bitter that an idea you cling to was challenged. If you want to engage in scientific discussion you must be prepared to have your ideas challenged and have some humility.
Your post is about sugar...
Sugar desolves in most liquids. 100% sugar desolves in blood.
The post is ridiculous, and I stand behind my previous comment - you're as ridiculous as your post.
Sugar dissolves in water and blood, therefore what? What are you trying to refute with that?
Resorting to attacks instead of making a clear point back to the science. Did you even read the article?
It's not sugar, as your post states.
Normally, obvious things shouldn't be spelled out, but here we are.
Also, that's not an insult - I just call it like I see it. And the fact that you play dumb is just confirming my initial evaluation of your mental ability, or the lack of it.