I am sorry but the committee of 300 is a disinformation book. Eustace Mullins exposed the author. If my memory serves me right the author of the committee of 300 stole from LaRouche's work and then shifted all blame to the British monarchy completely skirting around the Jew. The author also I think completely bankrupted a publisher who published valuable books for Istvan Bakony. It was u/clemaneuverers who thankfully pointed that out for me.
That's interesting. I've red Mullins and he seems legit.
The thing is the drama around Coleman himself doesn't change the things written in his book. Even if he borrowed a lot of it from other sources. I've already known about most of the things in the book from other books which further verifies the claims made. So what exactly is the disinfo part? All I can see is the Committee of 300 is among the best known books about the NWO conspiracy and it made many people aware of the organizations and names behind it and what the agenda is. He doesn't concentrate on the jews as much as other authors but he talks about zionism and its institutions like the ADL. His writings are consistent with what Quigley and Sutton wrote about.
The only thing that raised a red flag for me was the claim that the elites wanted to shut down NASA which contradicts the very origin of the agency. What, we are to believe they control all agencies concerned with military technology except this one?
I quote you: "the Committee of 300 is among the best known books about the NWO conspiracy and it made many people aware of the organizations and names behind it and what the agenda is..."
Exactly. Did it make anyone aware of who is REALLY behind the agenda? It's the most well known book because it's a planted book by the CIA and you can download it from their website so they can more easily save your IP as well. It gives you unimportant little tids and bits without you understanding the bigger picture. It doesn't focus on the Jews because it was ultimately written by Jews but it gives you a little morsel about the ADL because anyone looking for such a book either already knows about it or will know about it.
Everyone underestimates intelligence agencies. Intelligence agencies use "intelligence" to achieve their goals!
So you think if an intelligence agency wants to subvert that it will popularize a book full of lies or nonsense? The poison in the honey is well known tactic.
The linked article I shared earlier about Mullins and Coleman is short and worth a read IMO.
Below is a long story but it explains how these agencies work:
One talk show host started out as a legit Youtuber criticizing a dictator. Instead of kidnapping him or assassinating him That dictator's government hired him gradually by slowly giving him money though companies which he didn't suspect worked for that dictator's government. Then after he got used to the lifestyle that only that money could afford they started asking for some changes in his content and they even made him more popular!!! Imagine that! And he kept criticizing the dictator all the same while paid by the very same dictator!!
Those changes they asked from him were that he uses the name of "president" instead of derogatory terms, toning down things. Talking about "entertaining" trivial topics. Most of his audience never suspected a thing but the damage was done.
False opposition is a thing and it's very damaging. The elders of the protocols of zion talks about false opposition and it would have been a much better book to be the best known book about the conspiracy. Yet you were told it's a proven "forgery"
Exactly. Did it make anyone aware of who is REALLY behind the agenda? It's the most well known book because it's a planted book by the CIA and you can download it from their website so they can more easily save your IP as well. It gives you unimportant little tids and bits without you understanding the bigger picture. It doesn't focus on the Jews because it was ultimately written by Jews but it gives you a little morsel about the ADL because anyone looking for such a book either already knows about it or will know about it.
It being on .gov archives proves nothing - you can download almost any conspiracy book there including the Protocols. It gives a pretty good overview of the structure of the institutions that support the system and their functions - I'd say that's as big picture as one can get geopolitically (not spiritually though). It destroys the notion of free democratic society normies are indoctrinated with and reveals the level of planning and control behind it, proving there are no coincidences when it comes to social and political change and world events.
This is much more important than "naming the jew". In fact I bet you the jew wants to be named and scapegoated more than anything else so that he then can demonize the opposition and justify his retaliation. People bent on that game play right into their trap and give them the ammo to destroy us while achieving little in terms of countering their death-grip on the system.
So you think if an intelligence agency wants to subvert that it will popularize a book full of lies or nonsense? The poison in the honey is well known tactic.
Again, what are the lies in the book? I can verify most of the info from many different good sources. I red the article and replied having it in mind. It's something to consider and as I said I'm not sure about Coleman as a person but I can asses the information he puts forward. I can see it being plagiarized but still what he writes is common knowledge in the field by now. Different researchers focus on different things - Bill Cooper was basically pro-jewish and believed in the gas chamber fairytales, does that make him a plant? Same goes for Ioan Ratiu who wrote The Milner-Fabian conspiracy. Those are all different perspectives looking at the same phenomena - the NWO conspiracy and one can't get the full picture just by reading one perspective.
Look, elites use money for exraction of wealth from people to keep them below the level of independence not even talking about any competition.
Then they need to somehow utilize that money to prove their value. If they wouldn't spend them somehow, then, their money value will be lost quickly. What's the point of their money if even those who have them in billions can't find any real use for them?
Today they throw money they steal into military industry creating illusion that money worth something and at the same time converting them into their real wealth, control and power.
Space exploration is another obvious way to utilize money, but unlike military it is less profitable, because some things really could cost a lot, unlike military tech, and does not convert into power much. It is hard to punish some defiant country with Moon base or spaceship orbiting Mars. Also, space can't produce as much death as military tech could.
So, it is reasonable for them to get rid of any alternative to MIC and so reasonable questions about spending preferences. NASA is useless, since military could easily handle their space needs without any civilian structure.
Space exploration is another obvious way to utilize money, but unlike military it is less profitable, because some things really could cost a lot, unlike military tech, and does not convert into power much. It is hard to punish some defiant country with Moon base or spaceship orbiting Mars. Also, space can't produce as much death as military tech could.
It's not just about extracting wealth and resources but also about indoctrination and propaganda. Fifth generation warfare is about control of information and waging war against civil populations because people are viewed as a resource too as well as potential disruptors of the central planning. NASA is a military agency and it always has been since the time it was JPL ran by batshit crazy thelemite Jack Parsons and his fellow scientists they snagged from Germany.
NASA has huge cultural significance, especially in pop culture making it a vehicle for pushing certain messages and agendas (can you name another govt institution that sells as many T-shirts?) NASA promotes a certain worldview in society that places trust in The Science and sanctioned experts above anything else - it promotes scientism and materialism along with all Royal Society-bred institutions.
I am sorry but the committee of 300 is a disinformation book. Eustace Mullins exposed the author. If my memory serves me right the author of the committee of 300 stole from LaRouche's work and then shifted all blame to the British monarchy completely skirting around the Jew. The author also I think completely bankrupted a publisher who published valuable books for Istvan Bakony. It was u/clemaneuverers who thankfully pointed that out for me.
Look up: Eustace Mullins Exposed Dr. John Coleman In 1992
That's interesting. I've red Mullins and he seems legit.
The thing is the drama around Coleman himself doesn't change the things written in his book. Even if he borrowed a lot of it from other sources. I've already known about most of the things in the book from other books which further verifies the claims made. So what exactly is the disinfo part? All I can see is the Committee of 300 is among the best known books about the NWO conspiracy and it made many people aware of the organizations and names behind it and what the agenda is. He doesn't concentrate on the jews as much as other authors but he talks about zionism and its institutions like the ADL. His writings are consistent with what Quigley and Sutton wrote about.
The only thing that raised a red flag for me was the claim that the elites wanted to shut down NASA which contradicts the very origin of the agency. What, we are to believe they control all agencies concerned with military technology except this one?
I quote you: "the Committee of 300 is among the best known books about the NWO conspiracy and it made many people aware of the organizations and names behind it and what the agenda is..."
Exactly. Did it make anyone aware of who is REALLY behind the agenda? It's the most well known book because it's a planted book by the CIA and you can download it from their website so they can more easily save your IP as well. It gives you unimportant little tids and bits without you understanding the bigger picture. It doesn't focus on the Jews because it was ultimately written by Jews but it gives you a little morsel about the ADL because anyone looking for such a book either already knows about it or will know about it.
Everyone underestimates intelligence agencies. Intelligence agencies use "intelligence" to achieve their goals!
So you think if an intelligence agency wants to subvert that it will popularize a book full of lies or nonsense? The poison in the honey is well known tactic.
The linked article I shared earlier about Mullins and Coleman is short and worth a read IMO.
Below is a long story but it explains how these agencies work:
One talk show host started out as a legit Youtuber criticizing a dictator. Instead of kidnapping him or assassinating him That dictator's government hired him gradually by slowly giving him money though companies which he didn't suspect worked for that dictator's government. Then after he got used to the lifestyle that only that money could afford they started asking for some changes in his content and they even made him more popular!!! Imagine that! And he kept criticizing the dictator all the same while paid by the very same dictator!!
Those changes they asked from him were that he uses the name of "president" instead of derogatory terms, toning down things. Talking about "entertaining" trivial topics. Most of his audience never suspected a thing but the damage was done.
False opposition is a thing and it's very damaging. The elders of the protocols of zion talks about false opposition and it would have been a much better book to be the best known book about the conspiracy. Yet you were told it's a proven "forgery"
It being on .gov archives proves nothing - you can download almost any conspiracy book there including the Protocols. It gives a pretty good overview of the structure of the institutions that support the system and their functions - I'd say that's as big picture as one can get geopolitically (not spiritually though). It destroys the notion of free democratic society normies are indoctrinated with and reveals the level of planning and control behind it, proving there are no coincidences when it comes to social and political change and world events.
This is much more important than "naming the jew". In fact I bet you the jew wants to be named and scapegoated more than anything else so that he then can demonize the opposition and justify his retaliation. People bent on that game play right into their trap and give them the ammo to destroy us while achieving little in terms of countering their death-grip on the system.
Again, what are the lies in the book? I can verify most of the info from many different good sources. I red the article and replied having it in mind. It's something to consider and as I said I'm not sure about Coleman as a person but I can asses the information he puts forward. I can see it being plagiarized but still what he writes is common knowledge in the field by now. Different researchers focus on different things - Bill Cooper was basically pro-jewish and believed in the gas chamber fairytales, does that make him a plant? Same goes for Ioan Ratiu who wrote The Milner-Fabian conspiracy. Those are all different perspectives looking at the same phenomena - the NWO conspiracy and one can't get the full picture just by reading one perspective.
Thank you for the reply. You raise valid points and I get your view.
I think it could be legit.
Look, elites use money for exraction of wealth from people to keep them below the level of independence not even talking about any competition.
Then they need to somehow utilize that money to prove their value. If they wouldn't spend them somehow, then, their money value will be lost quickly. What's the point of their money if even those who have them in billions can't find any real use for them?
Today they throw money they steal into military industry creating illusion that money worth something and at the same time converting them into their real wealth, control and power.
Space exploration is another obvious way to utilize money, but unlike military it is less profitable, because some things really could cost a lot, unlike military tech, and does not convert into power much. It is hard to punish some defiant country with Moon base or spaceship orbiting Mars. Also, space can't produce as much death as military tech could.
So, it is reasonable for them to get rid of any alternative to MIC and so reasonable questions about spending preferences. NASA is useless, since military could easily handle their space needs without any civilian structure.
It's not just about extracting wealth and resources but also about indoctrination and propaganda. Fifth generation warfare is about control of information and waging war against civil populations because people are viewed as a resource too as well as potential disruptors of the central planning. NASA is a military agency and it always has been since the time it was JPL ran by batshit crazy thelemite Jack Parsons and his fellow scientists they snagged from Germany.
NASA has huge cultural significance, especially in pop culture making it a vehicle for pushing certain messages and agendas (can you name another govt institution that sells as many T-shirts?) NASA promotes a certain worldview in society that places trust in The Science and sanctioned experts above anything else - it promotes scientism and materialism along with all Royal Society-bred institutions.