The most successful attacks are the ones that go unnoticed and do not alert the system as a whole, or convince the system that they do not exist. Invisible parasites, subtle entrances, etc.
An exploit that straightforwardly pillages an ecosystem (as long as it's not utterly destroyed) will immediately produce anti-bodies/defenses against the attack. It will alert other systems that are vulnerable to the attack.
An exploit that slips between the cracks unnoticed and siphons energy or resources or mindshare is infinitely more effective.
The introduction of Christianity in the Middle Ages, the French Revolution, the Fiat Money Printer, the false savior Hitler, and Obama's final sellout that led to the compromised Internet.
All shapeless, all insidious, all causing the indignant end of the free men.
A suggestion implies extro (outwards)...consent implies intro (inwards). A jew extroverts (turning the outside) to tempt gentiles to introduce a suggested inversion into self.
Only within all can one shape.
All cannot be inside...only being can be inside all. Ones ignorance of all perceivable for the suggestions of another one implies the insidious trap.
All causes beginning (inception) and end (death) for each effected one (life) within wielding free will of choice.
One cannot experience the end of free...ones choice can be ignored for a chosen ones suggestion, which tempts one to believe in the end of free.