A) does a monkey smearing poo on a piece of paper make that piece of paper a document?
B) a mind of one man perceives the perceivable. Only perception is not truth. Witnesses recount the same event differently. Perhaps from poor memory management. Perhaps from an overloading of stimulus that scrambles the brain while it is storing memories.
C) home, box, office. A home can be a box of office. A box can be a home or office. And office can be a home or a box.
does a monkey smearing poo on a piece of paper make that piece of paper a document?
Doc-u-ment implies mentally holding onto suggested...the monkey adapted to perceivable by utilizing it on the fly.
Change "piece of paper" with "money" and a monkey still adapts to perceivable, while most humans would dock their mind with the suggested values thereof.
a mind of one man perceives the perceivable.
THE implies suggested the-ism by another tempting ones perception to ignore all perceivable.
Only perception is not truth
Perception implies one thing within everything perceivable...others suggest nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to distract one from everything perceivable.
Consenting to a suggestion implies holding onto a thesis (truth), which establishes an anti-thesis (lie), and a synthesis (conflict of reason) among all those consenting.
Witnesses recount the same event differently
Aka same event (inception towards death) different witnesses (life). The issue...counting and recounting to each other by means of suggested information. If one counts, then one becomes accountable by another, hence establishing an (((accountant))).
Perhaps from poor memory management.
a) Memory can only operate within a moving process...holding onto suggested information tempts one to ignore being moved within perceivable inspiration.
b) Consenting to suggested information permits another to manage the information held within ones mind.
an overloading of stimulus that scrambles the brain while it is storing memories.
a) Perceivable inspiration inspires resistance (life) to resist temptation (inception towards death)...that's natural stimulation.
b) Suggested information tempts one to hold onto it (overloading memory), hence burdening self aka subduing expression by scrambling repression.
c) Since memory can only operate within a moving process...it isn't a storage device (hard-drive), but a processing unit (ram). Yet, each unit wields the free will of choice to misuse memory as storage, while falling for the temptation of procession, which others exploit by suggesting progressivism to forward one... https://forward.com/
A home can be a box of office...
...if one consents to take shelter (home) within another ones suggested information (box), while ignoring that office/opus - "work; energy" sets each one within free from one another.
A box can be a home or office
Putting self into a box by consenting to a suggestion of another, permits another to decorate the box like a home, while calling it an office for one to work in and more importantly FOR others.
And office can be a home or a box
Being can only exist within office (energy)...being can be tricked to ignore self discernment by others tempting one to live in a box aka WILLING energy retention.
a) Is docking ones mind (doc-u-ment) a sign of intelligence (satoshi) or does it prevent a center (nakamoto) from expressing outwards?
b) Does mind/memory operate from center (ones perception) of circumference (all perceivable)?
c) HBO aka Home Box Office aka office (motion) generating a box (momentum) for home (matter).
A) does a monkey smearing poo on a piece of paper make that piece of paper a document?
B) a mind of one man perceives the perceivable. Only perception is not truth. Witnesses recount the same event differently. Perhaps from poor memory management. Perhaps from an overloading of stimulus that scrambles the brain while it is storing memories.
C) home, box, office. A home can be a box of office. A box can be a home or office. And office can be a home or a box.
Doc-u-ment implies mentally holding onto suggested...the monkey adapted to perceivable by utilizing it on the fly.
Change "piece of paper" with "money" and a monkey still adapts to perceivable, while most humans would dock their mind with the suggested values thereof.
THE implies suggested the-ism by another tempting ones perception to ignore all perceivable.
Perception implies one thing within everything perceivable...others suggest nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to distract one from everything perceivable.
Consenting to a suggestion implies holding onto a thesis (truth), which establishes an anti-thesis (lie), and a synthesis (conflict of reason) among all those consenting.
Aka same event (inception towards death) different witnesses (life). The issue...counting and recounting to each other by means of suggested information. If one counts, then one becomes accountable by another, hence establishing an (((accountant))).
a) Memory can only operate within a moving process...holding onto suggested information tempts one to ignore being moved within perceivable inspiration.
b) Consenting to suggested information permits another to manage the information held within ones mind.
a) Perceivable inspiration inspires resistance (life) to resist temptation (inception towards death)...that's natural stimulation.
b) Suggested information tempts one to hold onto it (overloading memory), hence burdening self aka subduing expression by scrambling repression.
c) Since memory can only operate within a moving process...it isn't a storage device (hard-drive), but a processing unit (ram). Yet, each unit wields the free will of choice to misuse memory as storage, while falling for the temptation of procession, which others exploit by suggesting progressivism to forward one... https://forward.com/
...if one consents to take shelter (home) within another ones suggested information (box), while ignoring that office/opus - "work; energy" sets each one within free from one another.
Putting self into a box by consenting to a suggestion of another, permits another to decorate the box like a home, while calling it an office for one to work in and more importantly FOR others.
Being can only exist within office (energy)...being can be tricked to ignore self discernment by others tempting one to live in a box aka WILLING energy retention.
It took an HBO documentary to figure out it was the government?
Its Adam Back you dolts, just look online
Adam Back is Satoshi Nakamoto! ( Meet the Founder of Bitcoin ) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iMwixTBsb0
He uses the same linker in his code as Satoshi