TL;DR: The LAPD has set the standard for the militarization of the police and their brutality towards the population. Occult markings on the organization go back almost a century. LAPD’s most prominent chief was from a family of generational Satanists standing just outside the spotlight of history for centuries.
There’s nothing particularly shocking here, at least not to me anymore. It’s the same hidden dirtbag occultists running their operations that are public yet unnoticed. I’ll spice it up—if you like that kind of thing—in a future post with the strange and disturbing context surrounding the Black Dahlia murder. Or I should say murders, as we will see.
I included that hyperlink so you could easily try to find the connections to Chief Parker for yourself, as a sort of exercise. Good luck. It’s not really an exercise, actually, it’s an example. See, They don’t need to orchestrate a huge coverup or use AI to alter the timeline or whatever. They just very quietly snip the tiny threads that bind history together and then reweave their own narratives. You can sometimes put things back together, but the more fundamental problem is that virtually no one realizes this is how it all works.
For now, let’s press on with Bill….
In a list stretching back to 1876, Chief William Henry Parker III is surely LAPD’s most prominent chief. That is, until the widely reviled Daryl Gates came along. We may thank Daryl for the blessing of SWAT teams. the gift that keeps on giving. He originally wanted it to stand for “Special Weapons Attack Teams”, which at least would be more honest. He also set the stage for Rodney King and his riots with "scandalous racist violence... [that] marked the LAPD under Gates's tempestuous leadership." Maybe that should all be no surprise:
Among his roles as an officer, he was picked to be the chauffeur for Chief William H. Parker. Gates often remarked that he gained many administrative and professional insights from Parker during the hours they spent together each day.
Sometimes, it really seems like they write this stuff just for me, doesn’t it? In any case, Parker seems to be the arch scumbag. In the very first paragraph of his wiki, we read:
During his tenure, the LAPD was known for police brutality and racism; Parker himself was known for his "unambiguous racism".
Nice. But what does that kind of behavior get you in this world? Why, they named Parker Center after him, of course! That was the headquarters of the Los Angeles Police Department from 1955 until October 2009, specially renamed for him after his death in 1966.
Remember, what gets put in wiki should be interpreted as “what They will admit to” and “what They want you to believe”. How bad was he really, do you think? They pour on whitewash by the gallon throughout the rest of the page. For example, Parker was supposedly eliminating police corruption. I might describe it as eliminating rival criminal elements and consolidating power.
We’re not here to blackwash Parker, though, but I will repeat this one fascinating (you’ll see!) factoid from his wiki:
Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry, a former LAPD officer, wrote speeches for Parker. Roddenberry is said to have modeled the character Mr. Spock after Parker.
Spock… an emotionless psychopath? Half-alien? Ha, no, I doubt that claim is true. And I suspect they just coincidentally spotted Roddenberry as a creative young writer and handed him the gig. Funny, though, all those conspiracy theorists that love to blackwash Roddenberry as FBI or CIA or a Mason or a Jesuit or a crypto-Jew or whatever never seem have noticed this one fact that I might have considered important (but do not).
Spock is not the only popular cultural reference. Did you know what I was talking about in the title when I wrote, “To protect and serve”? How about describing the police as the “thin blue line”? Both of those come courtesy of Chief Parker. I’ll comment more about this when I close.
The bonus of this post comes here in the middle with a Mandela Effect. It is one that does not exist but I want to show you one of the techniques They use to manufacture them.
Did anyone out there click reply when they read the title of this post, ready to hit me with an ackshually? Of course not. I suspect 0 out of 100 people are aware that the motto of the LAPD is not “To protect and serve”, it’s ackshually “To Protect and to Serve”.
The thing is, when was the last time you stopped to read the side of a patrol vehicle from the LAPD? Never, right? You heard it wrong and you repeated it wrong. It’s ackshually a bit shorter and therefore catchier when said the incorrect way, and that’s why it sticks and spreads. A supposed Mandela Effect could be achieved by sending forth shills to propagate the message, “Guise, guise, new Mandela Effect! Guess what they’re now saying the police motto is and always was?” Mandela Effect unlocked. Same trick was used for the “mirror, mirror” Mandela Effect. Before the “Effect”, how many people alive now ackshually watched the 1937 movie and said, “Hang on, I need to hear the exact wording here.” Zero.
Want more proof? Check out this disambiguation page for “To protect and to serve”. Of the six other references, none of them get it right. Do you really think no one in the CIA ever noticed this phenomenon and thought to use it to fuck with our heads? C’mon, man!
But let’s get even more ackshually with some detail I was unaware of until I started this research. You see, I had always assumed the “Rampart Division”. was just some arbitrary organizational subdivision of the LAPD, like it was the one between the Anagram Division and the Hairpart Division, along with many others. Wrong!
There are only two Divisions, the other being the LAPD Metropolitan Division. Discussion of LAPD organizational structure is beyond the scope of this post, but on the surface it looks to me like both of these divisions were set up and maintained as bastions of bad apples, if you get the concept. Got a goody-two-shoes in Metro or Rampart? Shuffle him off before he makes trouble trying to fix trouble. For both of these Divisions, well, you can read as much as you would like about their troubles.
Sure, we started with a Parker, but do I think there are nefarious occultists at work beyond that? I’ll let you decide but I came across this: the Rampart Division, the one set up by Parker just before he died, became operational in 1966. That’s said to be the number of the Fallen Angels, whatever that means. And the Metro Division went active in---you got it—1933.
Just like Rampart’s “To Protect and to Serve”, Metro also has a motto. Can these be occultic? Again, you’ll have to be the judge as to whether these are messages “hidden from the eye”. Rampart seeks “To Protect and To Serve”, but do you note that they do not specify whom they are protecting and serving? Dark Occultists love that kind of joke, don’t they? The Metro Division’s motto is “Can Do, Will Do”. A very famous occultist’s very famous motto comes immediately to mind, does it not?
I hate to end in a boring way instead of with that tasty Mandela bit, but for purposes of scholarship we have to document Chief William’s genealogy. Otherwise, we’re gonna get “ackshually he’s just a guy named Parker”. We can short-circuit it, though. Start with the man himself:
Chief William Henry Parker III (1905-1966)
Under “Parents and Siblings”, you can just keep clicking on the father’s link. I’m assuming you can guess which one identifies as the non-birthing partner. You’ll eventually get to this guy:
John Parker (about 1585 – after 1630)
There’s a lot of haziness here because those tiny threads I mentioned before have been cut. As near as I can figure, this John Parker is a guy I refer to as “Mayflower John”. There’s a “John Parker, Master Mate” that was aboard the ship, about which nothing is known. I think he was on a sort of advance mission. Anyway, there are three other Parkers that were born starting right after the John Parker listed above stopped having children. A sort of secret second family? A lot of genealogy connects with those three. The only item recorded about their fathers is that one of them is said to be “John”. Intriguing, right?
Finally, I wanted to comment about those popular cultural references tied to Parker. You see, when I look around, I notice those type of references to the Hidden Elite everywhere, used by people all the time in their everyday lives. And not just catchphrases but historical figures and events, consumer brands, place names, families and organizations, etc. It’s like “Rowdy” Roddy Piper’s glasses in “They Live”.
That vision is important—maybe even crucial—to this kind of research. There are a couple of critical differences, though. For one, Piper could take off the glasses when he wanted and go back to the world everyone else saw. The other is that, even if it took an overly lengthy brawl with Keith David, Piper could put the glasses on someone else and they would immediately and unavoidably see exactly what he saw. I just wanted to point out that that is where the metaphor breaks down utterly. People just think you’re an angry retard or whatever, which is not depicted in “They Live”. Also, in movies you can freely chew bubble gum and kick ass. Not, generally, in real life.
If you’re wondering where the generational Satanism of the Parker family comes in, this is the link (and I do not think Jay knows what his family has been up to historically):
Jay Parker | Satanic Ritual Abuse, Entity Invocation, & The Power of Consciousness (The Higherside Chats 12/9/2017)
If you’re read this far, I really appreciate your interest. More to come soon that you never heard about the Black Dahlia….
Thank you very much for thinking such a thing would be of interest to people! Want to hear something funny? By "funny", I mean alarming and dismaying.
I started writing about the Parkers and the Parsons to sort of "get them out of the way" before I started writing about more important families like the Percys, the Folgers, and the Coffins.
And I wanted to write about them to get them out of the way before I started writing about the important subjects like Tartaria, stolen history, the Anunnaki, what the Bible is really about, and human consciousness.
I try to do a good job and be complete, so when I set down to research and sort of make sure I have my arms around whatever little subject I thought I should write up, I find it always blows up in my face and becomes much bigger than I ever imagined.
The point is, there is so much that has been left unnoticed over the centuries. I'm pretty sure no one has ever noticed these same things I'm seeing because I've never seen a hint of it (besides "Miles Mathis", and we know his story). It would be a lot easier if I could just create a "link post" instead of "text post"... lol
The way I see it is that first priority should be given to liberty. First and foremost. After humanity is free they will discover true history on their own. You should focus on whatever you think would help nudge us in that direction. Even if just a nudge. I would say the discoveries you made in those ruling oligarchs are probably more unique than anything else but that's just me.