You're logic is flawed. People could see how the election was stolen. When they move the illegals around like they want, they will not need to cheat anymore.
What did people seeing the election was stolen accomplish practically? Your logic is flawed in thinking that it makes a difference whether the steal was obvious or not as the result is the same as it will be in the future with illegals. The ruling party installs who they want, as it has been for a long time.
There are plans however in the UN Agenda 2030 and the Rockefeller Foundation's Operation Lockstep that explicitly require people to lose faith in all existing institutions. If the popularization of election fraud in 2020 accomplished anything, it was to further THAT agenda. But that again supports my thesis as opposed to yours.
All you're trying to do is make people give up. Probably the oldest trick in the book. I think accounts like yours should piss people off enough to register and turn out. Anyone should be able to see your backwards thinking in this matter.
What did people seeing the election was stolen accomplish practically?
More of them are paying attention. It could affect how they vote. It's not really relevant, anyway.
Your logic is flawed in thinking that it makes a difference whether the steal was obvious or not as the result is the same as it will be in the future with illegals.
You do not know the future.
The ruling party installs who they want, as it has been for a long time.
We do not have to help them by deliberately creating targeted voter apathy.
There are plans however in the UN Agenda 2030 and the Rockefeller Foundation's Operation Lockstep that explicitly require people to lose faith in all existing institutions.
Show me. Citation needed.
If the popularization of election fraud in 2020 accomplished anything, it was to further THAT agenda.
Election fraud has not been "popularized." The situation does not boil down to one solitary goal.
But that again supports my thesis as opposed to yours.
I disagree. You have not said anything that meaninfully supports your desire that readers of conspiracy-related material refrain from voting.
To readers who have gotten this far, what you have just seen is a shill technique called a gish gallop. They demand that their litany of "points" is addressed before any meaninful discussion can continue.
The Gish gallop (/ˈɡɪʃ ˈɡæləp/) is a rhetorical technique in which a person in a debate attempts to overwhelm an opponent by presenting an excessive number of arguments, with no regard for their accuracy or strength, with a rapidity that makes it impossible for the opponent to address them in the time available. Gish galloping prioritizes the quantity of the galloper's arguments at the expense of their quality.
You're logic is flawed. People could see how the election was stolen. When they move the illegals around like they want, they will not need to cheat anymore.
What did people seeing the election was stolen accomplish practically? Your logic is flawed in thinking that it makes a difference whether the steal was obvious or not as the result is the same as it will be in the future with illegals. The ruling party installs who they want, as it has been for a long time.
There are plans however in the UN Agenda 2030 and the Rockefeller Foundation's Operation Lockstep that explicitly require people to lose faith in all existing institutions. If the popularization of election fraud in 2020 accomplished anything, it was to further THAT agenda. But that again supports my thesis as opposed to yours.
All you're trying to do is make people give up. Probably the oldest trick in the book. I think accounts like yours should piss people off enough to register and turn out. Anyone should be able to see your backwards thinking in this matter.
Don't address the points, just try to brute force your worldview to be correct through emotions.
What a good foot soldier
Your "points" are just time wasters.
More of them are paying attention. It could affect how they vote. It's not really relevant, anyway.
You do not know the future.
We do not have to help them by deliberately creating targeted voter apathy.
Show me. Citation needed.
Election fraud has not been "popularized." The situation does not boil down to one solitary goal.
I disagree. You have not said anything that meaninfully supports your desire that readers of conspiracy-related material refrain from voting.
To readers who have gotten this far, what you have just seen is a shill technique called a gish gallop. They demand that their litany of "points" is addressed before any meaninful discussion can continue.
Gish gallop https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop