All you're trying to do is make people give up. Probably the oldest trick in the book. I think accounts like yours should piss people off enough to register and turn out. Anyone should be able to see your backwards thinking in this matter.
What did people seeing the election was stolen accomplish practically?
More of them are paying attention. It could affect how they vote. It's not really relevant, anyway.
Your logic is flawed in thinking that it makes a difference whether the steal was obvious or not as the result is the same as it will be in the future with illegals.
You do not know the future.
The ruling party installs who they want, as it has been for a long time.
We do not have to help them by deliberately creating targeted voter apathy.
There are plans however in the UN Agenda 2030 and the Rockefeller Foundation's Operation Lockstep that explicitly require people to lose faith in all existing institutions.
Show me. Citation needed.
If the popularization of election fraud in 2020 accomplished anything, it was to further THAT agenda.
Election fraud has not been "popularized." The situation does not boil down to one solitary goal.
But that again supports my thesis as opposed to yours.
I disagree. You have not said anything that meaninfully supports your desire that readers of conspiracy-related material refrain from voting.
To readers who have gotten this far, what you have just seen is a shill technique called a gish gallop. They demand that their litany of "points" is addressed before any meaninful discussion can continue.
The Gish gallop (/ˈɡɪʃ ˈɡæləp/) is a rhetorical technique in which a person in a debate attempts to overwhelm an opponent by presenting an excessive number of arguments, with no regard for their accuracy or strength, with a rapidity that makes it impossible for the opponent to address them in the time available. Gish galloping prioritizes the quantity of the galloper's arguments at the expense of their quality.
I literally cited the two documents and told you what to look for, you should read them to have a better understanding of what's going on, I'm not going to pull the quotes out for you to just dismiss as that's very clearly all you care to do. Everything else you said is simply reinforcing your world view but is of no substance.
You misunderstand or misrepresent most of what I'm saying, and even contradict yourself, you say that most people paying attention is a practical outcome of the obvious steal but then say knowledge of voter fraud has not been popularized.
When you say I don't know the future, you are either unable to understand cause and effect or being disingenuous, the point is the election was stolen, that's the same practical effect that YOU are claiming will happen if the illegals are voting. I am not even the one claiming that, I'm explaining that practically what happened is no different than what will happen in YOUR world view provided these things come to pass
All my points were cohesive and followed each other, leading to a conclusion. Your ability to break them up and act like you don't understand them (or actual inability to understand them) and claim "citation needed" when I've given you the names of the actual documents is impressive. Also no one is watching this three day old thread with six points.
There are plans however in the UN Agenda 2030 and the Rockefeller Foundation's Operation Lockstep that explicitly require people to lose faith in all existing institutions.
All you're trying to do is make people give up. Probably the oldest trick in the book. I think accounts like yours should piss people off enough to register and turn out. Anyone should be able to see your backwards thinking in this matter.
Don't address the points, just try to brute force your worldview to be correct through emotions.
What a good foot soldier
Your "points" are just time wasters.
More of them are paying attention. It could affect how they vote. It's not really relevant, anyway.
You do not know the future.
We do not have to help them by deliberately creating targeted voter apathy.
Show me. Citation needed.
Election fraud has not been "popularized." The situation does not boil down to one solitary goal.
I disagree. You have not said anything that meaninfully supports your desire that readers of conspiracy-related material refrain from voting.
To readers who have gotten this far, what you have just seen is a shill technique called a gish gallop. They demand that their litany of "points" is addressed before any meaninful discussion can continue.
Gish gallop https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop
I literally cited the two documents and told you what to look for, you should read them to have a better understanding of what's going on, I'm not going to pull the quotes out for you to just dismiss as that's very clearly all you care to do. Everything else you said is simply reinforcing your world view but is of no substance.
You misunderstand or misrepresent most of what I'm saying, and even contradict yourself, you say that most people paying attention is a practical outcome of the obvious steal but then say knowledge of voter fraud has not been popularized.
When you say I don't know the future, you are either unable to understand cause and effect or being disingenuous, the point is the election was stolen, that's the same practical effect that YOU are claiming will happen if the illegals are voting. I am not even the one claiming that, I'm explaining that practically what happened is no different than what will happen in YOUR world view provided these things come to pass
All my points were cohesive and followed each other, leading to a conclusion. Your ability to break them up and act like you don't understand them (or actual inability to understand them) and claim "citation needed" when I've given you the names of the actual documents is impressive. Also no one is watching this three day old thread with six points.
Vote harder
Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development Lock Step Pages 18-25 https://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf
Where? Serious question. Just show us.
I have not misrepresented you, and now you are resorting to hairsplitting the definitions of words like "popularize."
Anyway, as always, vote. Not harder. Not more often. If you don't, they'll take the right away from you.