The Constitution Is Sacred. Is It Also Dangerous?
(www.nytimes.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Its no secret that george washington and the rest of them were freemasonry, royal family members.
However, people like my ancestors who helped to found townships and build the society that we eventually turned into america, were not.
Most of the work was done by honest hardworking people. The elite just doing what they doing, sitting at the top skimming everything they can while doing as little as possible.
The only thing the constitution is dangerous towards, is the rich and powerful, the elite.
The beauty of our constitution is we the people have the power to change it, we dont need presidents or congress. You will never see something like this in a crown country like canada or britain.
But people have forgotten and I dont know how we can wake them the fuck up. As a descendant of frontiersmen, I have a hard time living in this society.
I guess im confusing the declaration of independence with the constitution. But i put more stock in the declaration than anything, but of course its a rich persons game, legal bla bla bla. Criminals with a suit and a tie.
What we are facing now, is no different than what our ancestors faced then.
Can anyone show me another country with any similar legislation? I truly think america is unique in this.
We cant do this through violence, but it cant happen with elections either.
What it will take is every single one of us walking up to the steps of every taxpayer owned property and locking all these criminals up and throwing them in jail.
What the fuck, how the fuck are we going to do that when the rich are just fucking mind controlling people to hate each other.
I hate to be so fucking pessimistic, but lack of medical help is proally part of that.
That's the crux of it - they have monopoly on violence and run a covert police state. They use social engineering and mind control to influence people's beliefs and behavior which ultimately subverts the democratic process. This means both violent and non-violent opposition is not a threat to the status quo.
Maybe it's too late, maybe we're already in what Huxley called the Final revolution where there's no coming back. But then again Huxley was a shill for the NWO too. Even if they managed to build a 1984 totalitarian state it would still fall eventually.
Yes, I believe the American frontiersmen were decent, honest, hard-working and courageous people. There are still Americans like that and that's exactly what bugs me when I see them worshipping the founding freemasons. There were decent presidents and politicians like Andrew Jackson and James Garfield who were not part of the cabal too.
I mean I get why people downvote me for exposing the FF - they've been indoctrinated into the constitutionalist cult, equating patriotism with those fluffed up enlightenment ideas and probably I would have been too if I were from the US. There's a reason why masonic symbolism is everywhere and is practically institutionalized. The US was the first successfully created masonic state. The Constitution has good sides but my point was it's not grounded on anything meaningful and the claims it makes aren't justified. It may have worked out when people shared a common worldview (which is Christian) and lived in tight-knit communities but it's all dissolving now and we see the fruits of the experiment.