I recently posted a podcast with Eric Weinstein on this forum that addresses how the political process is used to vet candidates so that both are acceptable to the very rich.
If they wanted civil war they would have had it in the 1950s. They have done absolutely nothing except try to prevent civil war since they took control. I can’t believe that even you are still repeating this nonsense.
Civil war doesn't involve the entire population. It's typically a small percentage that fight. I believe they want a civil war to get the most radical to kill each other. The docile people remain
If they wanted that, it would have happened decades ago. I really don’t think you understand the scope of their power… They self-evidently don’t want war. They want controlled military action to slaughter all whites door to door, which they believe they can’t yet do.
They don't care who wins or loses (because both sides are in their back pocket), they just want a civil war.
I recently posted a podcast with Eric Weinstein on this forum that addresses how the political process is used to vet candidates so that both are acceptable to the very rich.
If they wanted civil war they would have had it in the 1950s. They have done absolutely nothing except try to prevent civil war since they took control. I can’t believe that even you are still repeating this nonsense.
Civil war doesn't involve the entire population. It's typically a small percentage that fight. I believe they want a civil war to get the most radical to kill each other. The docile people remain
If they wanted that, it would have happened decades ago. I really don’t think you understand the scope of their power… They self-evidently don’t want war. They want controlled military action to slaughter all whites door to door, which they believe they can’t yet do.
No argument there, but I think they would like civil war to thin the numbers first