Democracy: Beginning of the end?
(blogs.mediapart.fr)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Momentum implies the beginning (inception) and end (death) of matter (life)...if one ignores this process of setting apart, then one permits few power (cracy) over many (demo).
a) Ones consent to suggested pluralism (we) implies a contraction, which ignores singular (one) extension.
b) Extend aka ex (out) tendere (to stretch)...only within ongoing (inception towards death) can one temporary (life) stretch outwards.
c) Unlimited whole (motion) sets limited partials (matter) free to choose how to respond.
To tolerate; verb - "allow without interference"...being implies interference within all, hence each ones FREE will of choice interfering within the DOM-inance of balance.
Nature allows one to be free.
A parasitic few suggests an ignorant many to interfere with each others free will of choice within conflicts of reason (allow vs deny)...while ignoring natural balance for artificial imbalance.
Society/socius/sekw - "to follow" attacks resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) by lowering defense.
Ones consent to suggested socialism (society) and communism (community) attacks ones defenses. Aggregation makes many weaker than few, because among many...each one can shirk response-ability onto another, while doing jack shit about few.
Only during destruction (inception towards death) can a willing being (life) build growth...
The suggested rhetoric "will be destroyed" tempts a being to willingly focus on the suggested destruction of self, which in return prevents building.