Ayh have expounded on how your vote is an illusion. That is not an isolated thought shared on the internet.
Correction: Ayh HAVE said don't vote once. Ayh suggested that the only way to prove the system was a lie is to have an entire grouping NOT vote so as to disable the metrics and either prove or disprove it being engineered. Basic scientific process. And it would work too.. take one state, have every republican not vote for any thing, a NO VOTE, which shd be an option for peasants but no longer is, and ayh guarantee the pre-engineered digital system and handlers would not know how to rig the numbers. Algorithms and terrorist data collection would fumble all around demonstrating how the system is anticipating xyz.
There is roughly 1 year of the 4 years preserved readily available and 2 years searchably archived online. Aside that ayh have a rich inventory of saved offline data and oh yeah, there is my values expressed quite freely without necessity to lie. So, what displeases you about my admission to saying don't vote re as proof of process, but never saying don't vote to morons unwilling to admit their vote is pointless? Elaborate. Why does this specifically pierce you?
Your (((compliance))) rhetoric is pathetic
How is it compliance when you're the one telling people what to do almost every day? I don't have to do what they tell me.
Ayh never once said don't vote.
Ayh have expounded on how your vote is an illusion. That is not an isolated thought shared on the internet.
Correction: Ayh HAVE said don't vote once. Ayh suggested that the only way to prove the system was a lie is to have an entire grouping NOT vote so as to disable the metrics and either prove or disprove it being engineered. Basic scientific process. And it would work too.. take one state, have every republican not vote for any thing, a NO VOTE, which shd be an option for peasants but no longer is, and ayh guarantee the pre-engineered digital system and handlers would not know how to rig the numbers. Algorithms and terrorist data collection would fumble all around demonstrating how the system is anticipating xyz.
You have a long history here that you have erased. You're lying about everything.
There is roughly 1 year of the 4 years preserved readily available and 2 years searchably archived online. Aside that ayh have a rich inventory of saved offline data and oh yeah, there is my values expressed quite freely without necessity to lie. So, what displeases you about my admission to saying don't vote re as proof of process, but never saying don't vote to morons unwilling to admit their vote is pointless? Elaborate. Why does this specifically pierce you?