Ok, first off, you don't need to mute the volume if you are documenting a news story. Copyright law doesn't require that unless he is selling the footage. First red flag. Now I'll watch more...
They have bots that scan new uploads for music and flag shit that might be copyrighted, sometimes to the point of blocking it. This also prevents ads from playing on your video (for those who do that kind of thing). I think DrLeaks2's explanation holds water, and might explain why it took a while to be public.
I think YouTube would just censor it outright if there was anything damning to the unscripted, rather quiet narrative that's currently out there.
So in terms of perimeter security... there clearly was none as dozens of uncleared individuals loitered in the affected area in the minutes leading up to it
Ok, first off, you don't need to mute the volume if you are documenting a news story. Copyright law doesn't require that unless he is selling the footage. First red flag. Now I'll watch more...
Might be YouTube rules because they are a business that makes money off the content
They have bots that scan new uploads for music and flag shit that might be copyrighted, sometimes to the point of blocking it. This also prevents ads from playing on your video (for those who do that kind of thing). I think DrLeaks2's explanation holds water, and might explain why it took a while to be public.
I think YouTube would just censor it outright if there was anything damning to the unscripted, rather quiet narrative that's currently out there.
So in terms of perimeter security... there clearly was none as dozens of uncleared individuals loitered in the affected area in the minutes leading up to it