Conveniently a small woman in front to not block the shot.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
To try to make that apply to voting makes no sense to me. We aren't suppose to be lukewarm regarding the gospel, but we surely don't have to be passionate about supporting a wicked man running for office.
That is not a biblical requirement. It is a common argument that many worldly people make. In fact it is one you can find from many lukewarm or psuedo Christians across the country. So it is not in opposition to being a lukewarm Christian.
I don't believe their theater anymore. You're talking about the conspirators who gave us 9/11, JFK/RFK shot, (shows you they know how to make sure someone dies), Anthrax, OKC, Sandy Hook and Boston Bombing and you want to just take this at face value? They also gave us Alex Jones (controlled op) who pushed on us the controlled opposition President Trump.
Right off the bat it looks not only like a plot, but such a sloppy plot to indicate to me they want us to see it as an attempt on Trump and make that Zionist shill a hero. I would refer you to the "signs and lying wonders" from Revelation.
I'm no big supporter of voting and went along many years boycotting the vote because democracy is an obvious scam. I'm not making the normie argument of "it's your civil duty to vote because we believe in democracy" here. I'm appealing to us having free will and constantly being called to judge and discern what is right or wrong and held accountable for our choices.
It's an ethical problem. On its face it looks like a choice between principle based decision making vs. consequentialism (basically, the trolley problem). I argue, that even if you don't violate your principles by not voting for a bad candidate, your lack of action still brings in what I'd argue to be a worse candidate. You not voting is still a choice and a conscious action that has foreseeable consequences. You're still breaking your principle by allowing the worse candidate to get in office considering you had the power to prevent that. Your only counter to this is either "Trump is equally as bad or worse than Biden" (from what I gather this is your view) or "the whole voting thing is just a facade and bears no real significance" (in which case I'd ask you why even care about mainstream politics).
Sure, I have my skepticism too. But it's not just the shooting. They've been going hard against him since day one through all possible public/private channels. It wasn't that sloppy. They let their patsy get comfortable and shoot his load and Trump not biting the dust was an unforeseen consequence. It's not the first failed attempt at a president. They may have wanted to shook him up but that makes little sense because his supporters are even more resolved now. If they wanted to have SHTF scenario, they could have killed him and have a civil war break out. It's all speculation at this point.
As I explained (and you agreed with) the federal government is completely corrupt and thus a waste of energy. Voting for Zionist puppet 1 vs 2 when I despise both is a fools errand.
I use my energy to expose it was false and call out the psyops. Beyond that, I refuse to say "I want this person to rule", because I don't, so he does not get my vote.
Instead I vote with my dollars and put my energy towards what I believe is right. So I have no misgivings whatsoever saying "oh gas would have been so cheap under Trump". Those arguments make me laugh.
Fair enough. I get your point and gave my argument. Mainstream politics is truly a waste of time and I'm also working on waking people up about the evil we face while trying to live a good and righteous life. I'm currently translating Cap. Archibald Ramsey's The Nameless war to my native language. Check it out if you haven't, it's an amazing book on the history of the jewish revolutions: https://ia601905.us.archive.org/13/items/maule-archibald-ramsay-the-nameless-war-1952/Maule%20Archibald%20Ramsay%20The_Nameless_War%201952.pdf