Conveniently a small woman in front to not block the shot.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
You're buying into the false dialectic black and white framing. Sure, trump is a jew puppet but so are all the other candidates. He pushes the stabbies like the others except RFK, who's a climate freak which is as bad. Yet compared side by side, Trump's policies and agendas look better than the others.
Do we get the obvious demonic puppet like Biden, or Trump who may be demonic but has some redeeming qualities? It's not a good choice but all of us and our ancestors who let things get that bad are to blame. We made our own bed and suffer the consequences of our and their sins.
I'd rather have a clear set of standards (you can call it black and white) than some "grey" kind of thinking that is unclear.
If your standard for a leader is not being part of the beast system then stick by it. And if you want to look at solutions to tyranny look for actual solutions. For me voting for a Jew puppet is not one such options.
One president gave us covid lockdowns and a clot shot, the other president did the same thing but moved the ball down the field further. If you find that to be a meaningful distinction then I don't understand your way of thinking. It's not meaningful enough for me to waste energy voting or hoping for one president or another.
Everything worthwhile in politics is local. The federal government is completely corrupt and is their strong hold.
No argument here.
The problem is you're still culpable either way regardless if you actively vote, or passively allow the bigger of two evils to take control. That's relevant to Rev 3:16 on being lukewarm. Allowing evil is as bad as committing evil. You're presented with a choice and have to decide which one is the lesser evil. You could argue they are both equally evil and that may turn out to be the case, but considering the information we have betting on Trump is the right choice from a moral (Christian) standpoint and a simple sperg list of pros and cons can prove it.
The failed attempt on his life is yet one more reason to prefer him, because apparently tptb don't want him in the office and try their hardest to prevent that. If it didn't make a difference why would they bother? The point is, even among the jew elites there are fractions and points of contention.
To try to make that apply to voting makes no sense to me. We aren't suppose to be lukewarm regarding the gospel, but we surely don't have to be passionate about supporting a wicked man running for office.
That is not a biblical requirement. It is a common argument that many worldly people make. In fact it is one you can find from many lukewarm or psuedo Christians across the country. So it is not in opposition to being a lukewarm Christian.
I don't believe their theater anymore. You're talking about the conspirators who gave us 9/11, JFK/RFK shot, (shows you they know how to make sure someone dies), Anthrax, OKC, Sandy Hook and Boston Bombing and you want to just take this at face value? They also gave us Alex Jones (controlled op) who pushed on us the controlled opposition President Trump.
Right off the bat it looks not only like a plot, but such a sloppy plot to indicate to me they want us to see it as an attempt on Trump and make that Zionist shill a hero. I would refer you to the "signs and lying wonders" from Revelation.
I'm no big supporter of voting and went along many years boycotting the vote because democracy is an obvious scam. I'm not making the normie argument of "it's your civil duty to vote because we believe in democracy" here. I'm appealing to us having free will and constantly being called to judge and discern what is right or wrong and held accountable for our choices.
It's an ethical problem. On its face it looks like a choice between principle based decision making vs. consequentialism (basically, the trolley problem). I argue, that even if you don't violate your principles by not voting for a bad candidate, your lack of action still brings in what I'd argue to be a worse candidate. You not voting is still a choice and a conscious action that has foreseeable consequences. You're still breaking your principle by allowing the worse candidate to get in office considering you had the power to prevent that. Your only counter to this is either "Trump is equally as bad or worse than Biden" (from what I gather this is your view) or "the whole voting thing is just a facade and bears no real significance" (in which case I'd ask you why even care about mainstream politics).
Sure, I have my skepticism too. But it's not just the shooting. They've been going hard against him since day one through all possible public/private channels. It wasn't that sloppy. They let their patsy get comfortable and shoot his load and Trump not biting the dust was an unforeseen consequence. It's not the first failed attempt at a president. They may have wanted to shook him up but that makes little sense because his supporters are even more resolved now. If they wanted to have SHTF scenario, they could have killed him and have a civil war break out. It's all speculation at this point.