This is one of those places where "They" draw the line.
It's nothing specifically about Biden, it's that the general population cannot be allowed to know how things actually work. In the absence of that, everyone's mind will automatically fill in whatever makes them comfortable. If the subject ever comes up, the fact that no contradictory evidence is available is--incorrectly--taken to be confirmation.
Conspiracy theorists nearly universally consider the "Information War" to be something based entirely around "lies vs truth", but it actually includes numerous methodologies and techniques all aimed at keeping us away from the truth. The number is limited only by the imagination.
Conspiracy theorists nearly universally consider the "Information War" to be something based entirely around "lies vs truth"
That would be cool and good thing. Unfortunately it is mostly "lies vs delusions". It is incredibly hard to find conspiracy theorist who have no delusions and wrong conclusions, instilled by other, not so honest conspiracy theorists. Gladly, I see some who have courage to get rid of some delusions, even loved ones.
Yeah, that's true, they really get stuck defending their delusions against all comers. Of course, once you have discovered the "truth", the first person who should question it is yourself.
Regrettably, I don't think it's courage that's the problem, or perhaps it should be said that it's not the root of it. I believe that it actually has to do with the level of consciousness of individuals.
There's a middle level, above the NPCs, where they can break from the accepted authority but end up just selecting another authority. From there, that new "truth" can be rationalized to any extent whatsoever.
I suppose it could look like a failure (or inability) to face up to the idea that, "Any authority could be wrong on any point, as could I." Seems like a simple thing but, as you say, few do it.
Well, if that's what they did then we would have to answer the baffling question of why they didn't just say that. Care to try? We could all use a laugh these days.... lol (<- there it was)
This is one of those places where "They" draw the line.
It's nothing specifically about Biden, it's that the general population cannot be allowed to know how things actually work. In the absence of that, everyone's mind will automatically fill in whatever makes them comfortable. If the subject ever comes up, the fact that no contradictory evidence is available is--incorrectly--taken to be confirmation.
Conspiracy theorists nearly universally consider the "Information War" to be something based entirely around "lies vs truth", but it actually includes numerous methodologies and techniques all aimed at keeping us away from the truth. The number is limited only by the imagination.
(Notice I didn't say "the human imagination"?)
That would be cool and good thing. Unfortunately it is mostly "lies vs delusions". It is incredibly hard to find conspiracy theorist who have no delusions and wrong conclusions, instilled by other, not so honest conspiracy theorists. Gladly, I see some who have courage to get rid of some delusions, even loved ones.
Yeah, that's true, they really get stuck defending their delusions against all comers. Of course, once you have discovered the "truth", the first person who should question it is yourself.
Regrettably, I don't think it's courage that's the problem, or perhaps it should be said that it's not the root of it. I believe that it actually has to do with the level of consciousness of individuals.
There's a middle level, above the NPCs, where they can break from the accepted authority but end up just selecting another authority. From there, that new "truth" can be rationalized to any extent whatsoever.
I suppose it could look like a failure (or inability) to face up to the idea that, "Any authority could be wrong on any point, as could I." Seems like a simple thing but, as you say, few do it.
How do you know she wasn't fired for the journalistic malpractice of letting Biden decide his own questions?
If you were running the radio station would you not fire her for such a thing?
Well, if that's what they did then we would have to answer the baffling question of why they didn't just say that. Care to try? We could all use a laugh these days.... lol (<- there it was)
If she was fired right after publicly admitting to journalistic malpractice why you would assume it's for any other reason?
It is all scripted, this is nothing out of the ordinary.
Sure like pre-issued questions are any surprise to us.