WE...suggested pluralism to tempt perceiving partial to ignore self for others.
DO...suggested initialism tempting one to ignore being done by all, while enabled to redo self.
NOT...suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempting one to ignore all (everything perceivable)
KNOW...ones perception of all perceivable, which the suggestions of others tempt one to ignore.
who runs the show
Those looking at temptations shown by others are running out of resistance.
A consortium?
Many are the consortium of few aka collectivized partials following the lead of those remaining apart. It's called democracy aka DEMOS (people as a collective) KRATOS (strength)...the accumulated weakness of many becomes the strength of the few accumulating them.
Nature doesn't consort...it singles out each one from one another.
Those still need leadership
Where does a ship need to be led to? To a harbor which prevents a sea going vessel from navigating the sea? What lead does a ship need to follow?
SHIP/skip/skee - "to split" aka from whole sea (flow) into each partial vessel (form) navigating within aka nautical (inception towards death) generating terrestrial (life).
NAUTICAL/naughty/naught/nawiht - "nothing"...
He with this much power does not need attention drawn to him.
a) Power drives (inception towards death)...weakness (life) needs to draw power from being driven.
b) Attention aka AD (toward) TENDERE (to stretch) TION (action)...action (inception towards death) stretches out reactions (life).
Notice that nature reveals all perceivable to each ones perception...subterfuge implies concealment, hence tempting one to seek to escape. Doing so within nature implies escaping revelation.
Escaping shadows (suggested information); while ignoring revelation by light (perceivable inspiration)...what if one remains within shadow for as long as one holds onto something another suggested?
a) Agenda/agent/action doesn't roll together (con-trol)...it reveals reactions by setting each apart from one another.
b) Agenda from PIE root ag- "to drive, draw out or forth, move"...being implies seed springing forth from root, hence being moved.
most likely humans
Human aka hue (color) of man implies a visible spectrum of light; within which each ray is set apart from one another, hence differentiated....not alike.
A jew equalizes (inception towards death) differences (life) by tempting gentiles to react alike, which in return permits a chosen one to remain apart.
mass revealed
Motion (inception towards death) reveals matter (life) by setting apart...few within amass many together to conceal that revelation of matter.
is so hard people disbelief
To believe implies to hold onto, which costs ones resistance. Disbelief implies letting go of what one spends resistance to hold onto. The cost of spending ones own resistance is hard (matter) within the soft (motion) velocity of nature.
PEOPLE (suggested pluralism) is what PERSON (perceiving singular) chooses to hold onto, while selling self out to others for...and it's fucking hard to let go of, because it feels like a self sacrifice.
Ayh do prescribe to what Carlin simplified, they all come the same places and thus all have the same vested interests -- but every grouping has a hierarchy.. and no one on the stage has appeared as total authority. Closest was finger poking Rothschild.. who is dead now, so...
a) To know implies each singular one perceiving all perceivable...suggested pluralism (we) tempts one to ignore self for others.
b) WE; pronoun - "I and another or others aka we two"...there's no perceivable two without one counting and suggesting dualism to another.
As for AND...energy and what else? If energy is one; then what is two?
The Sanhedrin exists
a) Sanhedrin/synedrion - "assembly"...a jew assembles gentiles by tempting together aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka by equalizing (inception towards death) differences (life) set apart by nature.
b) Ex-ist implies ones consent to suggested existential-ism...doing so tempts one to ignore being EX (life) IM (inception towards death) aka expression (temporary growth) within impressing (ongoing loss).
Holding onto, while being (life) moved (inception towards death) implies running out of resistance.
Looking at (suggested) implies ignoring sight within (perceivable). To focus implies a point of convergence, which contradicts ones life sentence being moved towards point of death. Converging that which natures sets apart...destroys the converging partial, hence burning resistance.
The Sanhedrin IS the hierarchy. The Sanhedrin is like a senate or congress. At its head their is a leader. They always had a system and a state without borders or geographical nation.
The leader of that Sanhedrin is a Rabbi. Which Rabbi is now in charge? I do not know but does it make a difference? The figure who leads the Sanhedrin is of the Menachem Mendel Schneerson type.
In Brooklyn New York. A small yield nuclear bomb dropped on Brooklyn at the right time can solve all of the world's problems. Those who ultimately pull all the strings live in modest tiny apartments in Brooklyn, never take showers and don't even own a car.
All those Rothschilds, Hess, Montefiores, etc.. are secondary to the Rabbis. Their wealth would evaporate if they are excommunicated by the Rabbis.
Those looking at temptations shown by others are running out of resistance.
Many are the consortium of few aka collectivized partials following the lead of those remaining apart. It's called democracy aka DEMOS (people as a collective) KRATOS (strength)...the accumulated weakness of many becomes the strength of the few accumulating them.
Nature doesn't consort...it singles out each one from one another.
Where does a ship need to be led to? To a harbor which prevents a sea going vessel from navigating the sea? What lead does a ship need to follow?
SHIP/skip/skee - "to split" aka from whole sea (flow) into each partial vessel (form) navigating within aka nautical (inception towards death) generating terrestrial (life).
NAUTICAL/naughty/naught/nawiht - "nothing"...
a) Power drives (inception towards death)...weakness (life) needs to draw power from being driven.
b) Attention aka AD (toward) TENDERE (to stretch) TION (action)...action (inception towards death) stretches out reactions (life).
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Kenny-rogers-and-dolly-parton-islands-in-the-stream-lyrics
a) Light (motion) fragments (momentum) into particles (matter); which cast shadows onto each other.
b) Darkness (ignorance) within brightness (discernment)
c) "As I walk through the vALLey in the shadow of death...I take a look at my life and realize there's nothin' left"... https://genius.com/Coolio-gangstas-paradise-lyrics
Yaldaboath?
Do not forget this as you stumble thru the subterfuge.
Notice that nature reveals all perceivable to each ones perception...subterfuge implies concealment, hence tempting one to seek to escape. Doing so within nature implies escaping revelation.
Escaping shadows (suggested information); while ignoring revelation by light (perceivable inspiration)...what if one remains within shadow for as long as one holds onto something another suggested?
Read Jacques Vallee , Charles Fort, William Bramley and select few.
There is a control agenda on earth and most likely humans do not get to decide what gets mass revealed or not.
But sometimes peeks and leals happen, but brainwashing is so hard people disbelief these.
a) Agenda/agent/action doesn't roll together (con-trol)...it reveals reactions by setting each apart from one another.
b) Agenda from PIE root ag- "to drive, draw out or forth, move"...being implies seed springing forth from root, hence being moved.
Human aka hue (color) of man implies a visible spectrum of light; within which each ray is set apart from one another, hence differentiated....not alike.
A jew equalizes (inception towards death) differences (life) by tempting gentiles to react alike, which in return permits a chosen one to remain apart.
Motion (inception towards death) reveals matter (life) by setting apart...few within amass many together to conceal that revelation of matter.
To believe implies to hold onto, which costs ones resistance. Disbelief implies letting go of what one spends resistance to hold onto. The cost of spending ones own resistance is hard (matter) within the soft (motion) velocity of nature.
PEOPLE (suggested pluralism) is what PERSON (perceiving singular) chooses to hold onto, while selling self out to others for...and it's fucking hard to let go of, because it feels like a self sacrifice.
Ayh do prescribe to what Carlin simplified, they all come the same places and thus all have the same vested interests -- but every grouping has a hierarchy.. and no one on the stage has appeared as total authority. Closest was finger poking Rothschild.. who is dead now, so...
Actually we do know. The Sanhedrin exists and it's running the show. It's quite as simple as that.
a) To know implies each singular one perceiving all perceivable...suggested pluralism (we) tempts one to ignore self for others.
b) WE; pronoun - "I and another or others aka we two"...there's no perceivable two without one counting and suggesting dualism to another.
As for AND...energy and what else? If energy is one; then what is two?
a) Sanhedrin/synedrion - "assembly"...a jew assembles gentiles by tempting together aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka by equalizing (inception towards death) differences (life) set apart by nature.
b) Ex-ist implies ones consent to suggested existential-ism...doing so tempts one to ignore being EX (life) IM (inception towards death) aka expression (temporary growth) within impressing (ongoing loss).
SHOW/sceawian/skew - "behold, look at"...ones consent runs suggested shows.
Holding onto, while being (life) moved (inception towards death) implies running out of resistance.
Looking at (suggested) implies ignoring sight within (perceivable). To focus implies a point of convergence, which contradicts ones life sentence being moved towards point of death. Converging that which natures sets apart...destroys the converging partial, hence burning resistance.
But who is leader of that forum? Ever collaboration has a hierarchy
The Sanhedrin IS the hierarchy. The Sanhedrin is like a senate or congress. At its head their is a leader. They always had a system and a state without borders or geographical nation.
The leader of that Sanhedrin is a Rabbi. Which Rabbi is now in charge? I do not know but does it make a difference? The figure who leads the Sanhedrin is of the Menachem Mendel Schneerson type.
Where are they?
In Brooklyn New York. A small yield nuclear bomb dropped on Brooklyn at the right time can solve all of the world's problems. Those who ultimately pull all the strings live in modest tiny apartments in Brooklyn, never take showers and don't even own a car.
All those Rothschilds, Hess, Montefiores, etc.. are secondary to the Rabbis. Their wealth would evaporate if they are excommunicated by the Rabbis.