Thanks fren. Note that "solid dome" is not the Biblical text but something read into it much later. Note also that the word "water" is defined in the passage as very generic, as something from which land appears (i.e. it means "nonsolid"). Therefore the account is actually consistent with quark-gluon plasma theory of origin, and in fact there are no inconsistencies between Gen. 1:1-5 and Big Bang Theory.
Since Gen. 3-4 indicates that Yahweh got animal skins for Adam and Eve from somewhere, it's clear that the idea of sacrifice is his own and the demonic version is just the counterfeit. The reasons for this are well-explored in theology. If animal sacrifice offends you as a modern, you might want to become a vegan because bacon burgers are the same thing.
Thanks fren. Note that "solid dome" is not the Biblical text but something read into it much later. Note also that the word "water" is defined in the passage as very generic, as something from which land appears (i.e. it means "nonsolid"). Therefore the account is actually consistent with quark-gluon plasma theory of origin, and in fact there are no inconsistencies between Gen. 1:1-5 and Big Bang Theory.
Since Gen. 3-4 indicates that Yahweh got animal skins for Adam and Eve from somewhere, it's clear that the idea of sacrifice is his own and the demonic version is just the counterfeit. The reasons for this are well-explored in theology. If animal sacrifice offends you as a modern, you might want to become a vegan because bacon burgers are the same thing.
a) SAC'RIFICE, verb - "to devote (life) with loss (inception towards death)" aka ones sacrificial rite of passage.
b) Only during sacrifice can ideas be shaped.
Suggestion (information) pretends to be (counterfeit) perception (inspiration).
a) Only within fluid (inception towards death) can there be solid (life)
b) Defined aka definite (affixed) contradicts generic (fluid).
c) Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies fluid nature differentiating solids.
d) Water above (fluid) generates waters below (solid).