Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

26
16th Amendment (to collect taxes) was never legally ratified and pushed through illegally therefore it's null and void. Income tax remains unconstitutional and can be defeated in Court very easily. (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by LightBringerFlex 1 year ago by LightBringerFlex +32 / -6
82 comments share
82 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (82)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– DarkKnightPatriot 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Can anyone get a hold of the defense narrative and sources used by the defense attorney? His name is Lowell Becraft, of Huntsville Alabama. This needs to be assembled and distributed to as many people as possible. I am assuming that this means all personal and business taxes between 1913 and 1985, and later, if it was never ratified 'properly'.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– SwampRangers 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Great link, fren, but USA Today implies a mistake itself: actually, Lowell and Larry is the same Becraft, and this copy of the memo has no misspelling "Bercraft".

The data on the 16th amendment was collected by Bill Benson, who found material irregularities in every state's ratification of the 16th amendment, but the courts' position is that these irregularities are like many others that do not detract from the intent of the law and legislators. So, what Becraft calls a dead issue.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Jalapeno_gringo 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Businesses may be a different matter

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– LightBringerFlex [S] 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

This is old news. The attorney just used the evidence that has always existed to push it.

There are many books about this. One pretty good book is: Fruit from a poisonous vine.

Another is Great American Adventure by Judge Dale.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy