I take this as an indication that "They" still judge they need people to vote for their candidates. I mean, why else would they bother? It all just draws unwanted attention. It's like a bank robber walking in to the branch while open-carrying and arguing with the security guard about his 2nd Amendment rights.
I suppose one could argue that this is some sort of "double reverse", so that we're all fooled into thinking "They" don't already have it in the bag. But then WTF could possibly be the point of that if They already have it in the bag?
I take this as an indication that "They" still judge they need people to vote for their candidates. I mean, why else would they bother? It all just draws unwanted attention. It's like a bank robber walking in to the branch while open-carrying and arguing with the security guard about his 2nd Amendment rights.
I suppose one could argue that this is some sort of "double reverse", so that we're all fooled into thinking "They" don't already have it in the bag. But then WTF could possibly be the point of that if They already have it in the bag?