The 20th century summarized in a single tweet.
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
What's an "alt-right" historian? There's just one history, I don't care for political takes. I base what I say on historical evidence, documents and common sense.
Who am I to blame? Who runs global finance for the last few hundred years?
That was not the reason for the embargo and for them getting shafted by the US. Do you know how many imperialistic wars was Britain involved in at that time?
All wars are of economic origin.
All wars are economic?
Mohammed would have a word with you from hell about Jihad. As well, Richard the II from heaven about the crusades.
Don't speak in such broad terms which are easily disprovable.
And I never said any alt right historian, I say "any" meaning you're just as quick to think you're given some secret knowledge about "real" history...which is just as wrong oftentimes as mainstream history.
Tell that to Bernard Baruch, it's his quote. I picked it up from Eustace Mullins' Secrets of the Federal reserve.
How was Mohamed's war not economical in origin? Did he just convert people to islam without caring to extend his rule, taking land, slaves and spoils? The demonic goatfucker wanted to be rich and powerful. He was no different than the international bankers in that regard.
I would, if Bernard Baruch were still able to hear me.
Note how you shifted from "bankers' wars" to "economic origin" btw.
Are you aware the saying all wars are about resources is Marxist ideology? Even taken at face value, you have to go explain how the Crusades were economic in origin as the primary cause, or the War of Jenkins Ear, or even the War of 1812, which both were about national pride.
I didn't shift at all. Who controls the economy if not the bankers? That was not always the case and at the time of the crusades the economy was in the hands of the state and the church. But yeah, I'd argue the crusades were about conquest and resources and the ideology came second. If that weren't the case explain why the Vatican did jack shit to prevent the Ottomans raping and enslaving half of Europe's Christian population?
As for Napoleon, you guessed it, it was the bankers once again. Napoleon became his own banker and they weren't having it. Sure, there are other factors at play in all those events but we're talking about the origin and the primary movers. Here's the rundown: https://youtu.be/IKuVO4JaqBY?t=2758