It's not Flat earth. That is just language used against us to prevent shared knowledge.
a) Knowledge implies perceivable; language implies suggested. Language implies articulation (words) within natural (sound).
That represents the foundation for all deception. One cannot deceive another without suggesting to ignore perceivable.
b) Notice that you put "it's not" before flat earth...what does it matter that many reason against each other about flat earth vs round earth, while ignoring the implication of "it's not aka it is nothing".
The trick...reason (versus) distracts from implication (if/then).
The foundation for "not/nothing" implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempting ones consent to de-nial everything perceivable for it.
does not mean one needs to prove where we are
a) Meaning implies proving by suggestion. Nature doesn't prove meaning...it moves all perceivable through each ones perception.
b) Notice once again the use of "does not" to make a point within a conflict of reason (does vs does not).
c) Suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others. There's no we in nature unless one chooses to count other ones...few suggest collectivism to tempt many to count each other and thereby join together.
d) Where? Energy (internal/inherent power)....where else could being be sustainable?
we aren't where we are told
a) And the deception in that is "told/tell/tale" aka TELL, verb - "to utter; to express in words; to communicate to others".
Nature doesn't express in words...it moves sound, hence moving impressing sound through expressing instruments.
b) Third time's a charm..."aren't aka are nothing". Those deceived utilize nothing as their foundation to reason from.
c) What if being told by another contradicts ones "self discernment"? I can tell you how self discernment works, but you agreeing or disagreeing with that doesn't imply your SELF discernment.
It's not Flat earth. That is just language used against us to prevent shared knowledge.
Calling the globe and space the deception it is, does not mean one needs to prove where we are. Just that we aren't where we are told.
a) Knowledge implies perceivable; language implies suggested. Language implies articulation (words) within natural (sound).
That represents the foundation for all deception. One cannot deceive another without suggesting to ignore perceivable.
b) Notice that you put "it's not" before flat earth...what does it matter that many reason against each other about flat earth vs round earth, while ignoring the implication of "it's not aka it is nothing".
The trick...reason (versus) distracts from implication (if/then).
The foundation for "not/nothing" implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempting ones consent to de-nial everything perceivable for it.
a) Meaning implies proving by suggestion. Nature doesn't prove meaning...it moves all perceivable through each ones perception.
b) Notice once again the use of "does not" to make a point within a conflict of reason (does vs does not).
c) Suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others. There's no we in nature unless one chooses to count other ones...few suggest collectivism to tempt many to count each other and thereby join together.
d) Where? Energy (internal/inherent power)....where else could being be sustainable?
a) And the deception in that is "told/tell/tale" aka TELL, verb - "to utter; to express in words; to communicate to others".
Nature doesn't express in words...it moves sound, hence moving impressing sound through expressing instruments.
b) Third time's a charm..."aren't aka are nothing". Those deceived utilize nothing as their foundation to reason from.
c) What if being told by another contradicts ones "self discernment"? I can tell you how self discernment works, but you agreeing or disagreeing with that doesn't imply your SELF discernment.
You are making a bit more sense these days, for an experimental AI, but still pretty far out there
Show me any AI that can adapt to perceivable inspiration...impossible. Artifice (information) is shaped out of ignorance of natural (inspiration).
Then again...it is possible to trick anyone to ignore natural for artificial.
a) Nature makes (all perceivable); those within re-make (ones perception).
b) Sense (Latin sentio) implies ones perception within all perceivable....not anything suggested by another one.
c) Writing "you make" contradicts itself...you (ones suggestion) make (all perceivable).
Nature designates units (Latin unitas; one)...if one chooses to claim self as "me; myself or I"; then one brands other ones as "you".
Many ignoring this permits few to hide underneath YOU (phonetic jew). Another layer of that deception...YOU aka I-O-U (I own you).