again i never said he worked for ESA, nor made a single claim about the shape of the earth. What your doing now is called a red Herring Fallacy. I'm simply pointing out the discrepancies of the model based on "expert" testimony from the ones promoting it.
just take a deep breath, your letting your emotions over ride logic. iv seen your posts, your more intelligent then that.
I did give you one point, the CMB doesn't match what the preposed model claims.
Maybe I should clarify my position. I'm not arguing the shape of the earth, nor am i "flat earther". I'm a person who doesn't "believe" in things that I cant prove with my own research or logical deduction. Im more then ok saying im not certain or convinced of either.
To me saying things like a closed in realm with a loving god are just as silly as saying an infinite nothingness powered by random chaos.
again i never said he worked for ESA, nor made a single claim about the shape of the earth. What your doing now is called a red Herring Fallacy. I'm simply pointing out the discrepancies of the model based on "expert" testimony from the ones promoting it.
just take a deep breath, your letting your emotions over ride logic. iv seen your posts, your more intelligent then that.
So who from ESA said what you claim?
Then why quote him as reply to my question? If it's not relevant to my question, what's the point?
Here's my question again. Of course you will not answer it.
I did give you one point, the CMB doesn't match what the preposed model claims.
Maybe I should clarify my position. I'm not arguing the shape of the earth, nor am i "flat earther". I'm a person who doesn't "believe" in things that I cant prove with my own research or logical deduction. Im more then ok saying im not certain or convinced of either.
To me saying things like a closed in realm with a loving god are just as silly as saying an infinite nothingness powered by random chaos.